Changes in brain activation associated with reward processing in smokers and nonsmokersA positron emission tomography study

被引:0
|
作者
C. Martin-Sölch
S. Magyar
G. Künig
J. Missimer
W. Schultz
K. Leenders
机构
[1] PET Program,
[2] Center for Radiopharmaceutical Science,undefined
[3] Paul Scherrer Institute,undefined
[4] 5232 Villigen,undefined
[5] Switzerland,undefined
[6] Institute for Psychology,undefined
[7] University of Basel,undefined
[8] Bernouillistr. 16,undefined
[9] 4056 Basel,undefined
[10] Switzerland,undefined
[11] University Hospital Groningen,undefined
[12] Department of Neurology,undefined
[13] P.O. Box 30.001,undefined
[14] 9700 RB Groningen,undefined
[15] The Netherlands,undefined
[16] University of Fribourg,undefined
[17] Institute of Physiology,undefined
[18] University of Fribourg,undefined
[19] 1700 Fribourg,undefined
[20] Switzerland,undefined
[21] University Hospital of Zurich,undefined
[22] Department of Neurology,undefined
[23] Frauenklinikstrasse 26,undefined
[24] 8091 Zurich,undefined
[25] Switzerland,undefined
来源
关键词
Reward Striatum Positron emission tomography Tobacco smokers Human;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Tobacco smoking is the most frequent form of substance abuse. Several studies have shown that the addictive action of nicotine is mediated by the mesolimbic dopamine system. This system is implicated in reward processing. In order to better understand the relationship between nicotine addiction and reward in humans, we investigated differences between smokers and nonsmokers in the activation of brain regions involved in processing reward information. Using [H215O] positron emission tomography (PET), we measured regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in healthy smokers and nonsmokers while they performed a prelearned, pattern-recognition task. We compared two conditions involving nonmonetary reinforcement or monetary reward with a baseline condition in which nonsense feedback was presented. With monetary reward, we found activation in the frontal and orbitofrontal cortex, occipital cortex, cingulate gyrus, cerebellum, and midbrain in both groups. Additionally, monetary reward activated typical dopaminergic regions such as the striatum in nonsmokers but not in smokers. We found a similar pattern of activation associated with nonmonetary reinforcement in nonsmokers, whereas activation was found in smokers only in the cerebellum. The different patterns of activation suggest that the brains of smokers react in a different way to reward than those of nonsmokers. This difference involves in particular the regions of the dopaminergic system including the striatum. In principle these observations could be interpreted either as a consequence of tobacco use or as a primitive condition of the brain that led people to smoke. Supported by related nonimaging studies, we interpret these differences as a consequence of tobacco smoking, even if a short-term effect of smoking prior to the experiment cannot be excluded.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 286
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Changes in brain activation associated with reward processing in smokers and nonsmokers
    Martin-Sölch, C
    Magyar, S
    Künig, G
    Missimer, J
    Schultz, W
    Leenders, KL
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 139 (03) : 278 - 286
  • [2] Monkey brain activity modulated by reward preferences: A positron emission tomography study
    Obayashi, Shigeru
    Nagai, Yuji
    Suhara, Tetsuya
    Okauchi, Takashi
    Inaji, Motoki
    Iriki, Atsushi
    Maeda, Jun
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2009, 64 (04) : 421 - 428
  • [3] BRAIN ACTIVATION STUDY BY USE OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY IN UNANESTHETIZED MONKEYS
    TAKECHI, H
    ONOE, H
    IMAMURA, K
    ONOE, K
    KAKIUCHI, T
    NISHIYAMA, S
    YOSHIKAWA, E
    MORI, S
    KOSUGI, T
    OKADA, H
    TSUKADA, H
    WATANABE, Y
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1994, 182 (02) : 279 - 282
  • [4] Brain voice processing with bilateral cochlear implants: a positron emission tomography study
    Arnaud Coez
    Monica Zilbovicius
    Evelyne Ferrary
    Didier Bouccara
    Isabelle Mosnier
    Emmanuèle Ambert-Dahan
    Eric Bizaguet
    Jean-Luc Martinot
    Yves Samson
    Olivier Sterkers
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014, 271 : 3187 - 3193
  • [5] Brain voice processing with bilateral cochlear implants: a positron emission tomography study
    Coez, Arnaud
    Zilbovicius, Monica
    Ferrary, Evelyne
    Bouccara, Didier
    Mosnier, Isabelle
    Ambert-Dahan, Emmanuele
    Bizaguet, Eric
    Martinot, Jean-Luc
    Samson, Yves
    Sterkers, Olivier
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (12) : 3187 - 3193
  • [6] Dopaminergic Activity in Depressed Smokers: A Positron Emission Tomography Study
    Busto, Usoa E.
    Redden, Laura
    Mayberg, Helen
    Kapur, Shitij
    Houle, Sylvain
    Zawertailo, Laurie A.
    SYNAPSE, 2009, 63 (08) : 681 - 689
  • [7] Regional brain activity changes associated with fentanyl analgesia elucidated by positron emission tomography
    Adler, LJ
    Gyulai, FE
    Diehl, DJ
    Mintun, MA
    Winter, PM
    Firestone, LL
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (01): : 120 - 126
  • [8] Human brain region associated with penile erection: A positron emission tomography study
    Miyagawa, Y
    Tsujimura, A
    Fujita, K
    Matsuoka, Y
    Takahashi, T
    Takao, T
    Matsumiya, K
    Osaki, Y
    Takazawa, M
    Oku, N
    Hatazawa, J
    Okuyama, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 377 - 377
  • [9] Brain processing of pictures of children in men with pedophilic disorder: A positron emission tomography study
    Fonteille, Veronique
    Redoute, Jerome
    Lamothe, Pierre
    Straub, Dominique
    Lavenne, Frank
    Le Bars, Didier
    Raverot, Veronique
    Moulier, Virginie
    Marchand, Jean-Jacques
    Vittoz, Aurelie
    Leriche, Charlotte
    Pugeat, Michel
    Stoleru, Serge
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2019, 21
  • [10] Plasticity of language networks in patients with brain tumors: A positron emission tomography activation study
    Thiel, A
    Herholz, K
    Koyuncu, A
    Ghaemi, M
    Kracht, LW
    Habedank, B
    Heiss, WD
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 50 (05) : 620 - 629