How do multiple kernel functions in machine learning algorithms improve precision in flood probability mapping?

被引:0
|
作者
Muhammad Aslam Baig
Donghong Xiong
Mahfuzur Rahman
Md. Monirul Islam
Ahmed Elbeltagi
Belayneh Yigez
Dil Kumar Rai
Muhammad Tayab
Ashraf Dewan
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS),Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment (IMHE)
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS),Branch of Sustainable Mountain Development, Kathmandu Center for Research and Education
[3] CAS-TU,Department of Civil Engineering
[4] International University of Business Agriculture and Technology (IUBAT),Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture
[5] Mansoura University,Institute of Natural Disaster Research, School of Environment
[6] Northeast Normal University,School of Earth and Planetary Sciences
[7] Curtin University,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2022年 / 113卷
关键词
Hydro-climatic hazards; Machine learning algorithms; Gaussian process regression; Support vector machine; Climate change;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With climate change, hydro-climatic hazards, such as floods in the Himalayas regions, are expected to worsen, thus likely to overwhelm humans and socioeconomic system. Precisely, the Koshi River basin (KRB) is often impacted by floods over time. However, studies on estimating and predicting floods are still scarce in this basin. This study aims at developing a flood probability map using machine learning algorithms (MLAs): Gaussian process regression (GPR) and support vector machine (SVM) with multiple kernel functions including Pearson VII function kernel (PUK), polynomial, normalized poly kernel, and radial basis kernel function (RBF). Historical flood locations from available (topography, hydrogeology, and environmental) datasets were further considered to build a flood probability model. Two datasets were carefully chosen to measure the feasibility and robustness of MLAs: the training dataset (flood locations between 2010 and 2019) and the testing dataset (flood locations of 2020) with thirteen flood influencing factors. Validation of the MLAs was performed with statistical indices such as the coefficient of determination (r2: 0.546 –.995), mean absolute error (MAE: 0.009 –373), root mean square error (RMSE: 0.051–0.466), relative absolute error (RAE: 1.81–8.55%), and root-relative square error (RRSE: 10.19–91.00%). Results showed that the SVM-Pearson VII kernel (PUK) yielded better prediction than other algorithms. The resultant map from SVM-PUK revealed that 27.99% area with low, 39.91% area with medium, 31.00% with high, and 1.10% area with very high probabilities of flooding in the study area. The flood probability map, derived in this study, could add great value to the effort of flood risk mitigation and planning processes in KRB.
引用
收藏
页码:1543 / 1562
页数:19
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] How do multiple kernel functions in machine learning algorithms improve precision in flood probability mapping?
    Baig, Muhammad Aslam
    Xiong, Donghong
    Rahman, Mahfuzur
    Islam, Md. Monirul
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    Yigez, Belayneh
    Rai, Dil Kumar
    Tayab, Muhammad
    Dewan, Ashraf
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 113 (03) : 1543 - 1562
  • [2] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Flood Susceptibility Mapping
    Seydi, Seyd Teymoor
    Kanani-Sadat, Yousef
    Hasanlou, Mahdi
    Sahraei, Roya
    Chanussot, Jocelyn
    Amani, Meisam
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [3] DEM resolution effects on machine learning performance for flood probability mapping
    Avand, Mohammadtaghi
    Kuriqi, Alban
    Khazaei, Majid
    Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
    JOURNAL OF HYDRO-ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2022, 40 : 1 - 16
  • [4] Do Randomized Algorithms Improve the Efficiency of Minimal Learning Machine?
    Linja, Joakim
    Hamalainen, Joonas
    Nieminen, Paavo
    Karkkainen, Tommi
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2020, 2 (04): : 533 - 557
  • [5] How Do Implementation Bugs Affect the Results of Machine Learning Algorithms?
    Leotta, Maurizio
    Olianas, Dario
    Ricca, Filippo
    Noceti, Nicoletta
    SAC '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 34TH ACM/SIGAPP SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, 2019, : 1304 - 1313
  • [6] Assessment of machine learning algorithms and new hybrid multi-criteria analysis for flood hazard and mapping
    Solaimani K.
    Darvishi S.
    Shokrian F.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (22) : 32950 - 32971
  • [7] Flood susceptibility mapping in Indian Sundarban delta using multivariate statistics and machine learning algorithms in GIS
    Kundu, Souvik
    Mondal, Tarun Kumar
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2025,
  • [8] Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using SAR Data and Machine Learning Algorithms in a Small Watershed in Northwestern Morocco
    Hitouri, Sliman
    Mohajane, Meriame
    Lahsaini, Meriam
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Setargie, Tadesual Asamin
    Tripathi, Gaurav
    D'Antonio, Paola
    Singh, Suraj Kumar
    Varasano, Antonietta
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [9] Flood susceptibility mapping using machine learning boosting algorithms techniques in Idukki district of Kerala India
    Saravanan, Subbarayan
    Abijith, Devanantham
    Reddy, Nagireddy Masthan
    Parthasarathy, K. S. S.
    Janardhanam, Niraimathi
    Sathiyamurthi, Subbarayan
    Sivakumar, Vivek
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2023, 49
  • [10] Peer Grading in a Course on Algorithms and Data Structures: Machine Learning Algorithms do not Improve over Simple Baselines
    Sajjadi, Mehdi S. M.
    Alamgir, Morteza
    von Luxburg, Ulrike
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD (2016) ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING @ SCALE (L@S 2016), 2016, : 369 - 378