The role of external regulators in mergers and acquisitions: evidence from SEC comment letters

被引:0
|
作者
Tingting Liu
Tao Shu
Erin Towery
Jasmine Wang
机构
[1] Iowa State University,Debbie and Jerry Ivy College of Business
[2] Chinese University of Hong Kong,School of Management and Economics
[3] Shenzhen,Terry College of Business
[4] Shenzhen Finance Institute,McIntire School of Commerce
[5] University of Georgia,undefined
[6] University of Virginia,undefined
来源
关键词
SEC; Comment letters; M&A; Information asymmetry; Deal completion; Offer price revision; Deal duration; M41; G34; K22;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) involving publicly traded target firms. We find that deals receiving comment letters have an increased likelihood of deal completion and deal price revision, consistent with the SEC review process reducing information asymmetry, albeit at the cost of delaying the M&A process. Further analyses suggest that the SEC review process generates new value-relevant information via firms’ disclosure amendments in response to comment letters. We address endogeneity concerns using multiple approaches. Our findings that the SEC review process reduces information asymmetry in M&As provide new insight into the real economic consequences of disclosure regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 492
页数:41
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of external regulators in mergers and acquisitions: evidence from SEC comment letters
    Liu, Tingting
    Shu, Tao
    Towery, Erin
    Wang, Jasmine
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2024, 29 (01) : 451 - 492
  • [2] The oversight role of regulators: evidence from SEC comment letters in the IPO process
    Li, Bing
    Liu, Zhenbin
    REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2017, 22 (03) : 1229 - 1260
  • [3] The oversight role of regulators: evidence from SEC comment letters in the IPO process
    Bing Li
    Zhenbin Liu
    Review of Accounting Studies, 2017, 22 : 1229 - 1260
  • [4] Styles of Regulators: Evidence from the SEC's Comment Letters†
    Do, Truc Thuc
    Zhang, Huai
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 39 (02) : 789 - 825
  • [5] Mergers and acquisitions comment letters and analysts' ' earnings forecasts: Evidence from China
    Wan, Liangyong
    Li, Chen
    Xu, Rui
    Zhang, Hao
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 86
  • [6] Information asymmetry, regulatory inquiry, and company mergers and acquisitions: evidence from Shenzhen Stock Exchange comment letters
    Chen, Wanyi
    Hu, Ning
    Zhao, Xiangfang
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 62 (02): : 2497 - 2542
  • [7] The Materiality of Accounting Errors: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters
    Acito, Andrew A.
    Burks, Jeffrey J.
    Johnson, W. Bruce
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (02) : 839 - 868
  • [8] Evaluating the SEC Review of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Comment Letters
    Valdivia, Victor
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2010, 30 (01): : 234 - 246
  • [9] The Benefits of Overvaluation: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions
    Vagenas-Nanos, Evangelos
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 49 (01) : 91 - 133
  • [10] Auditor Style and Common Disclosure Issues: Evidence from SEC Comment Letters
    Baugh, Matthew D.
    Schmardebeck, Roy
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 98 (05): : 61 - 97