UTASTAR method and its application in multi-criteria warehouse location selection

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammad Ehsanifar
David A. Wood
Arezoo Babaie
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Industrial Engineering, Arak Branch
[2] DWA Energy Limited,undefined
来源
关键词
Selecting optimum warehouse locations; Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); UTASTAR; Utility functions; Ranking preferences;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To effectively manage large industrial companies, decision-making regarding the location of distribution warehouses are particularly important. Locating distribution warehouses is a multi-criteria problem in which the decision-making process is influenced by several quantitative and qualitative criteria. Among the methods proposed to aid location selection, the UTASTAR method is shown to be suitable for clarifying the decision-making process. This method determines single utility functions for each alternative location considered. This aids in the evaluation and comparison of alternative location options based on the preferences of the decision makers expressed in terms of multiple criteria. UTASTAR results enable managers and decision makers to rank the identified options and thereby justify the most suitable option to select as the preferred warehouse location. This research shows the effective application of the UTASTAR method in a case study relating to the selection by the Damghan Steel Company (Iran), from several alternatives, of the best location to construct its central warehouse. The approach proposed offers a new perspective to the problem of warehouse location selection by calculating single utility functions that meaningfully represent the relative values of alternative warehouse locations from a decision makers perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 215
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] UTASTAR method and its application in multi-criteria warehouse location selection
    Ehsanifar, Mohammad
    Wood, David A.
    Babaie, Arezoo
    OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (1-2) : 202 - 215
  • [2] MULTI-CRITERIA WAREHOUSE LOCATION
    EILON, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & MATERIALS MANAGEMENT, 1982, 12 (01): : 42 - 45
  • [3] Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral
    Demirel, Tufan
    Demirel, Nihan Cetin
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (05) : 3943 - 3952
  • [4] Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria
    Dey, Balaram
    Bairagi, Bipradas
    Sarkar, Bijan
    Sanyal, Subir Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (04) : 262 - 278
  • [5] Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem
    Ozcan, Tuncay
    Celebi, Numan
    Esnaf, Sakir
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (08) : 9773 - 9779
  • [6] A Framework for Multi-Criteria Optimal Location Selection
    Zhang, Ji
    Ku, Wei-Shinn
    Jiang, Xunfei
    Qin, Xiao
    Sun, Min-Te
    Lu, Hua
    23RD ACM SIGSPATIAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2015), 2015,
  • [7] FACTORS AND MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS CONDITIONING THE SELECTION OF WAREHOUSE LOCATIONS
    Baran, Joanna
    Zukowska, Olga
    CARPATHIAN LOGISTICS CONGRESS (CLC' 2016), 2017, : 273 - 279
  • [8] Sustainable Warehouse Location Selection in Humanitarian Supply Chain: Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Mittal, Rubina
    Obaid, Amna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2023, 8 (02) : 316 - 335
  • [9] AN APPLICATION OF HYBRID FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD ON A LOCATION-SELECTION PROBLEM
    Kolacek, Michal
    Matulova, Marketa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN ECONOMICS: MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING XIX, 2018, : 172 - 178
  • [10] Location Theory and Multi-Criteria Decision Making: An Application of the MOORA Method
    Brauers, Willem K. M.
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2018, 12 (03) : 241 - 252