Intergroup Biases as a Function of Reflected Status Appraisals and Support for Legitimizing Ideologies: Evidence from the USA and Israel

被引:0
|
作者
Christopher M. Federico
Shana Levin
机构
[1] University of Minnesota,Department of Psychology
[2] Claremont McKenna College,undefined
关键词
status; legitimacy; ingroup bias; ideology;
D O I
10.1023/B:SORE.0000018092.85878.f6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Theory and research suggest that members of high-status groups feel more positively about their own group than members of low-status groups feel about their group. The studies presented here test two hypotheses derived from this general idea (1) that members of high-status groups will show greater bias in favor of the in-group when they believe that others perceive the status difference between their group and relevant low-status groups to be larger; and (2) that this relationship will be stronger when high-status group members also endorse ideologies legitimizing their privileged status. However, because low group status may have “self-protective” properties, it was hypothesized that imputed status differences would not relate to out-group bias among low-status group members, regardless of ideology endorsement. Two studies—using samples from the United States and Israel, respectively—provided clear support for these hypotheses. Implications for the study of both intergroup biases and legitimizing ideologies are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 73
页数:26
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] The Role of Legitimizing Ideologies as Predictors of Ambivalent Sexism in Young People: Evidence from Italy and the USA
    Cristina Mosso
    Giovanni Briante
    Antonio Aiello
    Silvia Russo
    Social Justice Research, 2013, 26 : 1 - 17
  • [2] The Role of Legitimizing Ideologies as Predictors of Ambivalent Sexism in Young People: Evidence from Italy and the USA
    Mosso, Cristina
    Briante, Giovanni
    Aiello, Antonio
    Russo, Silvia
    SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2013, 26 (01) : 1 - 17