Correction to: Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports

被引：0
|
作者：
Michael J. Kane
Bridget A. Smeekens
Matt E. Meier
Matthew S. Welhaf
Natalie E. Phillips
机构：
[1] University of North Carolina at Greensboro,Department of Psychology
[2] Western Carolina University,undefined
来源：
Behavior Research Methods | 2021年 / 53卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01685-4
引用
收藏
页码：2743 / 2743
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports
    Michael J. Kane
    Bridget A. Smeekens
    Matt E. Meier
    Matthew S. Welhaf
    Natalie E. Phillips
    Behavior Research Methods, 2021, 53 : 2372 - 2411
  • [2] Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports (Apr, 10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x, 2021)
    Kane, Michael J.
    Smeekens, Bridget A.
    Meier, Matt E.
    Welhaf, Matthew S.
    Phillips, Natalie E.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2021, 53 (06) : 2743 - 2743
  • [3] Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports
    Weinstein, Yana
    De Lima, Henry J.
    van der Zee, Tim
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) : 754 - 760
  • [4] Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports
    Yana Weinstein
    Henry J. De Lima
    Tim van der Zee
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2018, 25 : 754 - 760
  • [5] Children with positive attitudes towards mind-wandering provide invalid subjective reports of mind-wandering during an experimental task
    Zhang, Yi
    Song, Xiaolan
    Ye, Qun
    Wang, Qinqin
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2015, 35 : 136 - 142
  • [6] Objective markers of sustained attention fluctuate independently of mind-wandering reports
    Chidharom, Matthieu
    Bonnefond, Anne
    Vogel, Edward K.
    Rosenberg, Monica D.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2025,
  • [7] A mind-wandering account of the testing effect: Does context variation matter?
    Wong, Sarah Shi Hui
    Lim, Stephen Wee Hun
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2022, 29 (01) : 220 - 229
  • [8] A mind-wandering account of the testing effect: Does context variation matter?
    Sarah Shi Hui Wong
    Stephen Wee Hun Lim
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2022, 29 : 220 - 229
  • [9] The Four Factors of Mind Wandering Questionnaire: Content, Construct, and Clinical Validity
    Lopez, Antonella
    Caffo, Alessandro O.
    Tinella, Luigi
    Bosco, Andrea
    ASSESSMENT, 2023, 30 (02) : 433 - 447
  • [10] A “Goldilocks zone” for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement
    Matthew S. Welhaf
    Matt E. Meier
    Bridget A. Smeekens
    Paul J. Silvia
    Thomas R. Kwapil
    Michael J. Kane
    Behavior Research Methods, 2023, 55 : 327 - 347
123