Central aortic pulse pressure, thrombogenicity and cardiovascular risk

被引:0
|
作者
Gailing Chen
Kevin P. Bliden
Rahul Chaudhary
Fang Liu
Himabindu Kaza
Eliano P. Navarese
Udaya S. Tantry
Paul A. Gurbel
机构
[1] Sinai Hospital,Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research
[2] China-Japan Friendship Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[3] Inova Center for Thrombosis Research and Drug Development,Division of Medicine
[4] Inova Heart and Vascular Institute,Department of Neurology
[5] Sinai Hospital of Baltimore,undefined
[6] Beijing Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
Myocardial ischemia; Aortic pulse pressure; Hypercoagulability; Thrombelastography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
High central aortic pulse pressure (CPP) and thrombin-induced platelet–fibrin clot strength (TIP–FCS) have been associated with ischemic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease in separate studies. But, the ischemic risk associated with these factors has never been analyzed in a single study and their interrelation is unknown. The primary aim of the study was to establish cut points for CPP and TIP–FCS measured at the time of catheterization associated with long term major adverse cardiovascular events. We enrolled 334 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and assessed thrombogenicity by thrombelastography. Patients were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke and the secondary endpoint was occurrence of the primary endpoint or recurrent ischemic events requiring hospitalization. Patients with primary and secondary endpoint occurrence had higher CPP (83 ± 20 vs. 60 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.0001; 70 ± 21 vs. 59 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.0001, respectively) and TIP–FCS (68.5 ± 5.8 vs. 65.5 ± 5.0 mm, p = 0.008; 67.4 ± 5.9 vs. 65.2 ± 4.8 mm, p = 0.001, respectively). CPP >60 mmHg and TIP–FCS >69 mm were both independent predictors of primary endpoint occurrence (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.02, respectively). ROC analysis for CPP and TIP–FCS showed a C-statistic of 0.81 (p < 0.0001) and 0.68 (p = 0.007) for the primary endpoint, respectively. Patients with CPP >60 mmHg had higher TIP–FCS (66.8 ± 5.1 vs. 64.8 ± 5.0 mm, p < 0.001) and primary and secondary endpoint occurrence (13 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.0001 and 31.8 vs. 14.4%, p = 0.0002, respectively). CPP >60 mmHg + TIP–FCS > 69 mm was associated with a markedly increased risk of primary endpoint occurrence [HR (95% CI) 5.4(2.3–12.5), p = 0.0001]. High CPP and thrombogenicity are interrelated; each are independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk; and simultaneous presence markedly enhances risk. The mechanistic link between CPP and thrombogenicity deserves further study.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 233
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Central aortic pulse pressure, thrombogenicity and cardiovascular risk
    Chen, Gailing
    Bliden, Kevin P.
    Chaudhary, Rahul
    Liu, Fang
    Kaza, Himabindu
    Navarese, Eliano P.
    Tantry, Udaya S.
    Gurbel, Paul A.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2017, 44 (02) : 223 - 233
  • [2] Relation between invasive central pulse pressure and thrombogenicity
    Chen, G.
    Bliden, K.
    Liu, F.
    Tantry, U.
    Gurbel, P.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2015, 13 : 291 - 291
  • [3] Invasive aortic pulse pressure is not superior to cuff pulse pressure in cardiovascular risk prediction
    Laugesen, Esben
    Knudsen, Soren T.
    Hansen, Klavs W.
    Rossen, Niklas B.
    Jensen, Lisette Okkels
    Hansen, Michael S.
    Andersen, Lone K.
    Thomsen, Kristian K.
    Sondergaard, Hanne
    Bottcher, Morten
    Raungaard, Bent
    Olesen, Kevin K. W.
    Maeng, Michael
    Botker, Hans Erik
    Poulsen, Per L.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 (04) : 607 - 613
  • [4] Pulse pressure and aortic pulse wave are markers of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive populations
    Asmar, R
    Rudnichi, A
    Blacher, J
    London, GM
    Safar, ME
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 14 (02) : 91 - 97
  • [5] Central Pulse Pressure: Is It Really an Independent Predictor of Cardiovascular Risk?
    Kopec, Grzegorz
    Podolec, Piotr
    HYPERTENSION, 2008, 52 (01) : E4 - E4
  • [6] Central aortic blood pressure and cardiovascular risk - A paradigm shift?
    Avolio, Alberto
    HYPERTENSION, 2008, 51 (06) : 1470 - 1471
  • [7] Pulse pressure and cardiovascular risk
    Benetos, A
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 17 : S21 - S24
  • [8] High central aortic pulse pressure is linked to heightened thrombogenicity and predicts poorer outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease
    Gurbel, P. A.
    Chen, G.
    Bliden, K.
    Liu, F.
    Chaudary, R.
    Kaza, H.
    Tantry, U.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 967 - 967
  • [9] Central Pulse Pressure: Is It Really an Independent Predictor of Cardiovascular Risk? Response
    Jankowski, Piotr
    Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina
    HYPERTENSION, 2008, 52 (01) : E5 - E5
  • [10] Central Aortic Blood Pressure as a Marker of Arteriosclerotic Vascular Damage and Cardiovascular Risk
    Liu, Z. D.
    Lu, F. H.
    Zhao, Y. X.
    Wang, S. J.
    Jin, S. K.
    Sun, S. W.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 114 : 114 - 114