The determinants and effects of board nomination committees

被引:102
作者
Ruigrok W. [1 ]
Peck S. [2 ]
Tacheva S. [1 ]
Greve P. [1 ]
Hu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Research Institute for International Management (FIM-HSG), University of St. Gallen, 9000, St. Gallen
[2] Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
关键词
Board demographic diversity; Board independence; Nomination committees;
D O I
10.1007/s10997-006-0001-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article assesses the corporate governance-related antecedents of nomination committee adoption, and the impact of nomination committees' existence and their composition on board independence and board demographic diversity. We conducted a longitudinal study of board composition amongst 210 Swiss public companies from January 2001 through December 2003, a period during which the Swiss (Stock) Exchange (SWX) introduced new corporate governance-related disclosure guidelines. We find firms with nomination committees are more likely to have a higher number of independent and foreign directors, but not more likely to have a higher number of female board members. Further, the existence of nomination committees is associated with a higher degree of nationality diversity but is not related to board educational diversity. We also find that nomination committee composition matters in the nomination of independent and foreign, but not of female directors. Our results suggest that understanding different board roles and composition require a multi-theoretical approach, and that agency theory, resource-dependence theory and group effectiveness theory help to explain different aspects of board composition and effectiveness. Finally, the article discusses the concept of diversity and appropriate ways to study diversity in a boardroom context. © Springer 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 148
页数:29
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Aguilera R.V., Jackson G., The cross-cultural diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants, Academy of Management Review, 28, 3, pp. 447-465, (2003)
[2]  
Athanassiou N., Nigh D., The impact of U.S. company internationalisation on top management team advice networks, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1, pp. 83-92, (1999)
[3]  
Barnhart S.W., Marr M.W., Rosenstein S., Firm performance and board composition: Some new evidence, Managerial & Decision Economics, 15, 4, pp. 329-340, (1994)
[4]  
Baysinger B.D., Butler H.N., Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition, Journal of Law, Economics & Organisation, 1, 1, pp. 101-124, (1985)
[5]  
Berle A.A., Means G.C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, (1932)
[6]  
Berscheid E., Walster E., Interpersonal Attraction, (1978)
[7]  
Bilimoria D., Piderit S.K., Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 6, pp. 1453-1477, (1994)
[8]  
Blau P.M., Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure, (1977)
[9]  
Boone C., Van Olffen W., Van Witteloostuijn A., De Brabander B., The genesis of top management team diversity: Selective turnover among top management teams in Dutch newspaper publishing, Academy of Management Journal, 47, 5, pp. 633-656, (2004)
[10]  
Byrne D., The Attraction Paradigm, (1971)