Efficacy of Rainfall-Runoff Models in Loose Coupling Spacial Decision Support Systems Modelbase

被引:0
|
作者
Sílvio Luís Rafaeli Neto
Eder Alexandre Schatz Sá
Aline Bernarda Debastiani
Víctor Luís Padilha
Thiago Alves Antunes
机构
[1] University of the State of Santa Catarina – UDESC,Department of Environmental and Sanitary Engineering
[2] University of the State of Santa Catarina – UDESC,Department of Soils
[3] Federal University of Paraná – UFPR,Department of Forest Engineering
[4] University of the State of Santa Catarina – UDESC,Department of Geography
[5] University of the State of Santa Catarina – UDESC,Department of Forest Engineering
来源
关键词
Hydrological modeling; Water resources management; SWAT; TOPMODEL; Decision tree; Artificial neural network;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The need for a prognosis for water resources management in Brazil means that studies with hydrological models are required, as part of a Spatial Decision Support System (SDSS). Choosing the model in a modelbase requires knowledge of the performance of the existing models in the specific situations in which they are to be applied. This paper evaluated the performance of two physically-based models and two numerical-based models in their ability to represent the rainfall-runoff process. The study occurred in a watershed in southern Brazil. Historical data series from the same periods were taken to calibrate and train the models, using two different periods to validate their efficacy. The results show that the SWAT and TOPMODEL models presented an inferior performance compared to the numerical-based models (RT and ANN). However, all the models presented satisfactory levels of efficacy and the potential for use in different management situations.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 904
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of Rainfall-Runoff Models in Loose Coupling Spacial Decision Support Systems Modelbase
    Rafaeli Neto, Silvio Luis
    Schatz Sa, Eder Alexandre
    Debastiani, Aline Bernarda
    Padilha, Victor Luis
    Antunes, Thiago Alves
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2019, 33 (03) : 889 - 904
  • [2] COMPARISON OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS
    WEEKS, WD
    HEBBERT, RHB
    NORDIC HYDROLOGY, 1980, 11 (01) : 7 - 24
  • [3] RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS.
    Abdel-Aal, Farouk M.
    Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1982, 1 (02): : 105 - 119
  • [4] Runoff components simulated by rainfall-runoff models
    Buchtele, J.
    Elias, V.
    Tesar, M.
    Herrmann, A.
    Hydrological Sciences Journal, 1996, 41 (01):
  • [5] Runoff components simulated by rainfall-runoff models
    Buchtele, J
    Elias, V
    Tesar, M
    Herrmann, A
    HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 1996, 41 (01): : 49 - 60
  • [6] Estimation of evaporation in rainfall-runoff models
    Chapman, TG
    MODSIM 2003: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOLS 1-4: VOL 1: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 1; VOL 2: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 2; VOL 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS; VOL 4: GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2003, : 148 - 153
  • [7] Fuzzy conceptual rainfall-runoff models
    Özelkan, EC
    Duckstein, L
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 253 (1-4) : 41 - 68
  • [8] Rainfall-runoff process models validation
    Vega-Manganiello, Ana C.
    Quines F, Veronica C.
    Guevara, Edilberto
    INGENIERIA UC, 2015, 22 (03): : 89 - 104
  • [9] Topics related to rainfall-runoff models
    Shamseldin, AY
    RIVER BASIN MODELLING FOR FLOOD RISK MITIGATION, 2006, : 171 - 180
  • [10] CRITERION OF EFFICIENCY FOR RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS
    GARRICK, M
    CUNNANE, C
    NASH, JE
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1978, 36 (3-4) : 375 - 381