Assessing Financial Loss due to Pluvial Flooding and the Efficacy of Risk-Reduction Measures in the Residential Property Sector

被引:0
|
作者
Janez Sušnik
Clemens Strehl
Luuk A. Postmes
Lydia S. Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia
Hans-Joachim Mälzer
Dragan A. Savić
Zoran Kapelan
机构
[1] University of Exeter,Centre for Water Systems College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences
[2] UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education,Integrated Water Systems and Governance Department
[3] IWW Water Centre,Green and Water Department
[4] Municipality of Eindhoven,undefined
来源
关键词
Doorstep distribution; Financial cost-benefit analysis; Pluvial flooding; Probabilistic risk assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A novel quantitative risk assessment for residential properties at risk of pluvial flooding in Eindhoven, The Netherlands, is presented. A hydraulic model belonging to Eindhoven was forced with low return period rainfall events (2, 5 and 10-year design rainfalls). Three scenarios were analysed for each event: a baseline and two risk-reduction scenarios. GIS analysis identified areas where risk-reduction measures had the greatest impact. Financial loss calculations were carried out using fixed-threshold and probabilistic approaches. Under fixed-threshold assessment, per-event Expected Annual Damage (EAD) reached €38.2 m, with reductions of up to €454,000 resulting from risk-reduction measures. Present costs of flooding reach €1.43bn when calculated over a 50-year period. All net-present value figures for the risk-reduction measures are negative. Probabilistic assessment yielded EAD values up to more than double those of the fixed-threshold analysis which suggested positive net-present value. To the best of our knowledge, the probabilistic method based on the distribution of doorstep heights has never before been introduced for pluvial flood risk assessment. Although this work suggests poor net-present value of risk-reduction measures, indirect impacts of flooding, damage to infrastructure and the potential impacts of climate change were omitted. This work represents a useful first step in helping Eindhoven prepare for future pluvial flooding. The analysis is based on software and tools already available at the municipality, eliminating the need for software upgrading or training. The approach is generally applicable to similar cities.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 179
页数:18
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Assessing Financial Loss due to Pluvial Flooding and the Efficacy of Risk-Reduction Measures in the Residential Property Sector
    Susnik, Janez
    Strehl, Clemens
    Postmes, Luuk A.
    Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, Lydia S.
    Maelzer, Hans-Joachim
    Savic, Dragan A.
    Kapelan, Zoran
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (01) : 161 - 179
  • [2] Assessment of the effectiveness of a risk-reduction measure on pluvial flooding and economic loss in Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Susnik, J.
    Strehl, C.
    Postmes, L. A.
    Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L. S.
    Savic, D. A.
    Kapelan, Z.
    Maelzer, H-J
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING AND CONTROL FOR THE WATER INDUSTRY, CCWI2013, 2014, 70 : 1619 - 1628
  • [3] Assessing urban potential flooding risk and identifying effective risk-reduction measures
    Cherqui, Frederic
    Belmeziti, Ali
    Granger, Damien
    Sourdril, Antoine
    Le Gauffre, Pascal
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 514 : 418 - 425
  • [4] Comparison of risk reduction works on areas high threat due to flooding over a sector of the Tonchala Quebrada of San Jose de Cucuta
    Chona-Jurado, Heynner Yesid
    Cely-Calixto, Nelson Javier
    Carrillo-Soto, Gustavoadolfo
    UIS INGENIERIAS, 2023, 22 (03): : 167 - 176
  • [5] Oncology and Care in Specialist and general mediaAdjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Loss of Efficacy through Interruption or Dose Reduction? Risk of Cervical Dysplasia and Cervical Carcinoma due to Hormone Spiral? Cooling or Compression against Peripheral Neuropathy? Increased Risk of Breast Cancer Relapse due to Rheumatoid Biologics? CyberKnife® instead of conventional Radiation for Prostate Cancer?
    Gaisser, A.
    ONKOLOGE, 2020, 26 (09): : 856 - 862