Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students' online academic success

被引:69
作者
Artino A.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Navy, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, 20814-4712
关键词
Achievement emotions; Continuing motivation; Motivational beliefs; Online learning; Satisfaction; Self-regulated learning; Web-based training;
D O I
10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study employed a social-cognitive view of self-regulated learning to examine how several personal factors relate to academic success in an online course. Service academy undergraduates (N = 481) completed a survey that assessed their motivational beliefs (self-efficacy and task value); negative achievement emotions (boredom and frustration); and several outcomes that included their use of self-regulated learning strategies (elaboration and metacognition), course satisfaction, and continuing motivation to enroll in future online courses. Results from several multiple regressions revealed that task value beliefs were the strongest and most consistent positive predictors of elaboration, metacognition, satisfaction, and continuing motivation; whereas self-efficacy beliefs were moderately strong positive predictors of satisfaction and continuing motivation only. On the other hand, students' boredom and frustration were statistically significant predictors of metacognition, with boredom emerging as a negative predictor and frustration unexpectedly emerging as a positive predictor. Furthermore, both boredom and frustration were negatively related to satisfaction and continuing motivation. Taken together, results from this study provide some insight into the complex relations between students' thoughts, feelings, and actions in an online course. Theoretical and empirical implications are discussed, as are study limitations and future directions. © 2009 US Government.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 166
页数:20
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Abrami P.C., Bernard R.M., Research on distance education: In defense of field experiments, Distance Education, 24, pp. 5-26, (2006)
[2]  
Alexander P., Graham S., Harris K., A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects, Educational Psychology Review, 10, pp. 129-154, (1998)
[3]  
Arbuckle J.L., Amos 7.0 User's Guide, (2006)
[4]  
Artino A.R., Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, pp. 191-202, (2007)
[5]  
Artino A.R., Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, pp. 260-270, (2008)
[6]  
Artino A.R., McCoach D.B., Development and initial validation of the online learning value and efficacy scale, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, pp. 279-303, (2008)
[7]  
Artino A.R., Stephens J.M., Learning online: Motivated to self-regulation?, Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10, 4, pp. 176-182, (2006)
[8]  
Azevedo R., Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning, Educational Psychologist, 40, pp. 199-209, (2005)
[9]  
Bandura A., Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, (1997)
[10]  
Bandura A., Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales, Adolescence and Education, Vol. 4: Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, pp. 307-337, (2006)