How firms’ participation in apprenticeship training fosters knowledge diffusion and innovation

被引:0
|
作者
Rupietta C. [1 ,3 ]
Backes-Gellner U. [2 ]
机构
[1] Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Gaussstrasse 20, Wuppertal
[2] Department of Business Administration, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 14, Zurich
[3] Jackstädt Center of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Research, University of Wuppertal, Gaussstrasse 20, Wuppertal
关键词
Apprenticeship training; Innovation; Knowledge diffusion; Vocational education;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-018-0924-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Previous studies typically relate apprenticeship training or more generally ‘Vocational Education and Training’ (VET) to training that is highly specific and that uses well-established technologies. Accordingly, apprenticeship training is typically not expected to have positive effects on innovation. In contrast, we argue in this paper that the type of dual apprenticeship training seen in Switzerland (or Germany and Austria) does create positive innovation effects due to the VET system’s built-in and institutionalized curriculum development and updating processes. These processes ensure that firms participating in apprenticeship training gain access to knowledge that is close to the innovation frontier and that ultimately fosters innovation. We provide theoretical explanations of how this knowledge diffusion works and how it can help to generate innovation. We use the Swiss VET system as one example and derive hypotheses about the relationship between firms’ participation in apprenticeship training and their innovation outcomes. Empirical analyses support our hypotheses. In a VET system with a built-in curriculum-updating process like the one in Switzerland (or Germany), firms participating in apprenticeship training have higher innovation outcomes than do non-participating firms. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 597
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] (How) are Brazilian firms managing knowledge for innovation?
    Davila, Guillermo Antonio
    Andreeva, Tatiana
    Varvakis, Gregorio
    IFKAD 2017: 12TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY: RESILIENCE, CREATIVITY AND CO-CREATION, 2017, : 17 - 31
  • [2] How urban fabric fosters knowledge transfer and innovation: the example of Barcelona
    Santamaria-Varas, Mar
    Martinez-Diez, Pablo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ISOCARP CONGRESS, 2015,
  • [3] From knowledge to innovation: examining how and when leader knowledge sharing behavior fosters employees' work innovation
    Hamid, Zeeshan
    Dar, Nasib
    Kundi, Yasir Mansoor
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2025,
  • [4] The Role of Regional Knowledge Generation and Diffusion in Firms' Innovation Activity
    Hajek, Petr
    Bahakim, Ahmed
    Zeminova, Katerina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2016, : 350 - 356
  • [5] The costs of standardized apprenticeship curricula for training firms
    Schweri, Jurg
    Aepli, Manuel
    Kuhn, Andreas
    EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [6] The costs of standardized apprenticeship curricula for training firms
    Jürg Schweri
    Manuel Aepli
    Andreas Kuhn
    Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13
  • [7] How does knowledge inertia affect firms product innovation?
    Xie, Xuemei
    Fang, Liangxiu
    Zeng, Saixing
    Huo, Jiage
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (05) : 1615 - 1620
  • [8] Small firms' motivations in offering apprenticeship training in Switzerland
    Baumeler, Carmen
    Lamamra, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK, 2024, 37 (5-6) : 367 - 381
  • [9] How Do Firms Leverage Their Innovation Capabilities via Knowledge Accumulation?
    Zhang Jun
    Xu Qing-rui
    INNOVATION-DRIVEN CAPABILITY BUILDING AND INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT (ISMOT'16), 2016, : 315 - 321
  • [10] How knowledge collecting fosters organizational creativity
    Giustiniano, Luca
    Lombardi, Sara
    Cavaliere, Vincenzo
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2016, 54 (06) : 1464 - 1496