Urological research in Germany A retrospective, longitudinal observational study

Background and objectives The congress of the German Society of Urology reflects urologic research in German-speaking countries. The objective was to identify trends by analyzing the congress' abstracts and following full publications longitudinally. Materials and methods The abstracts of the 2016 congress were systematically analyzed regarding content, study design, cooperation, following full publications and journals which they were published in. Thereafter, the 2016 congress was compared to the 2002 and 2009 congresses. Statistical analysis included chi(2)-, Mann-Whitney U-, Cochran-Armitage-, and Kruskal-Wallis test. Results A total of 1073 abstracts were presented at the 2002, 2009, and 2016 congresses. We found an increase in abstracts regarding prostate disease (24.2%, 29.7%, and 34.0%; p & x202f;= 0.0043), oncological abstracts (50.6%, 57.9%, and 61.7%; p & x202f;= 0.003), multicenter studies (18.3, 28.6, and 34.3%; p & x202f;< 0.0001) and cooperation (55.6%, 62.9%, and 70.5%, p & x202f;< 0.0001). Experimental (29.0%, 33.2%, and 22.8%; p & x202f;= 0.009) and prospective studies (62.1%, 42.0%, and 36.0%; p & x202f;< 0.0001) declined. s including statistical analysis (18.4%, 14.7%, and 41.2%; p & x202f;< 0.0001) and the impact factor of following full publications (2.08, 3.42, 4.42; p & x202f;< 0.0001) rose. In 2016, 11.2% of those full publications were published Open Access. The publication rates of the presented abstracts were 49.1%, 56.3%, and 52.3%, respectively (p & x202f;= 0.15). Conclusions National and international networking of the urological research community has increased. Presentation of prospective studies has declined. The rate of peer-reviewed full publications following the DGU abstracts remains at a stable high level over the three congresses. The publication rate in Open Access journals is low.