Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI

被引:0
|
作者
Mozhou Gao
Zhenyu Xing
Coleman Vollrath
Chris H. Hugenholtz
Thomas E. Barchyn
机构
[1] University of Calgary,Centre for Smart Emissions Sensing Technologies, Department of Geography
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Satellite observations have been used to measure methane (CH4) emissions from the oil and gas (O&G) industry, particularly by revealing previously undocumented, very large emission events and basin-level emission estimates. However, most satellite systems use passive remote sensing to retrieve CH4 mixing ratios, which is sensitive to sunlight, earth surface properties, and atmospheric conditions. Accordingly, the reliability of satellites for routine CH4 emissions monitoring varies across the globe. To better understand the potentials and limitations of routine monitoring of CH4 emissions with satellites, we investigated the global observational coverage of the TROPOMI instrument onboard the Sentinel-5P satellite—the only satellite system currently with daily global coverage. A 0.1° × 0.1° gridded global map that indicates the average number of days with valid observations from TROPOMI for 2019–2021 was generated by following the measurement retrieval quality-assurance threshold (≥ 0.5). We found TROPOMI had promising observational coverage over dryland regions (maximum: 58.6%) but limited coverage over tropical regions and high latitudes (minimum: 0%). Cloud cover and solar zenith angle were the primary factors affecting observational coverage at high latitudes, while aerosol optical thickness was the primary factor over dryland regions. To further assess the country-level reliability of satellites for detecting and quantifying CH4 emissions from the onshore O&G sector, we extracted the average annual TROPOMI observational coverage (TOC) over onshore O&G infrastructure for 160 countries. Seven of the top-10 O&G-producing countries had an average annual TOC < 10% (< 36 days per year), which indicates the limited ability to routinely identify large emissions events, track their duration, and quantify emissions rates using inverse modelling. We further assessed the potential performance of the latter by combining TOC and the uncertainties from the global O&G inventory. Results indicate that the accuracy of emissions quantifications of onshore O&G sources using TROPOMI data and inverse modeling will be higher in countries located in dryland and mid-latitude regions and lower in tropical and high-latitude regions. Therefore, current passive-sensing satellites have low potential for frequent monitoring of large methane emissions from O&G sectors in countries located in tropical and high latitudes (e.g., Canada, Russia, Brazil, Norway, and Venezuela). Alternative methods should be considered for routine emissions monitoring in these regions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global observational coverage of onshore oil and gas methane sources with TROPOMI
    Gao, Mozhou
    Xing, Zhenyu
    Vollrath, Coleman
    Hugenholtz, Chris H.
    Barchyn, Thomas E.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [2] Onshore methane emissions measurements from the oil and gas industry: a scoping review
    Vollrath, Coleman
    Hugenholtz, Chris H.
    Barchyn, Thomas E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (03):
  • [3] A tale of two regions: methane emissions from oil and gas production in offshore/onshore Mexico
    Zavala-Araiza, Daniel
    Omara, Mark
    Gautam, Ritesh
    Smith, Mackenzie L.
    Pandey, Sudhanshu
    Aben, Ilse
    Almanza-Veloz, Victor
    Conley, Stephen
    Houweling, Sander
    Kort, Eric A.
    Maasakkers, Joannes D.
    Molina, Luisa T.
    Pusuluri, Abhinand
    Scarpelli, Tia
    Schwietzke, Stefan
    Shen, Lu
    Zavala, Miguel
    Hamburg, Steven P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [4] Developing a spatially explicit global oil and gas infrastructure database for characterizing methane emission sources at high resolution
    Omara, Mark
    Gautam, Ritesh
    O'Brien, Madeleine A.
    Himmelberger, Anthony
    Franco, Alex
    Meisenhelder, Kelsey
    Hauser, Grace
    Lyon, David R.
    Chulakadabba, Apisada
    Miller, Christopher Chan
    Franklin, Jonathan
    Wofsy, Steven C.
    Hamburg, Steven P.
    EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2023, 15 (08) : 3761 - 3790
  • [5] Global assessment of oil and gas methane ultra-emitters
    Lauvaux, T.
    Giron, C.
    Mazzolini, M.
    d'Aspremont, A.
    Duren, R.
    Cusworth, D.
    Shindell, D.
    Ciais, P.
    SCIENCE, 2022, 375 (6580) : 557 - +
  • [6] Methane and ethane emission quantifications from onshore oil and gas sites in Romania, using a tracer gas dispersion method
    Delre, Antonio
    Hensen, Arjan
    Velzeboer, Ilona
    van den Bulk, Pim
    Edjabou, Maklawe Essonanawe
    Scheutz, Charlotte
    ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [7] Information spillovers in onshore oil and gas exploration
    Levitt, Clinton J.
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 45 : 80 - 98
  • [8] OIL AND GAS POSSIBILITIES ONSHORE AND OFFSHORE GHANA
    KEESE, GO
    AAPG BULLETIN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1984, 68 (09): : 1204 - 1204
  • [9] Minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America and their implications for measuring oil and gas methane emissions
    Dubey, Luke
    Cooper, Jasmin
    Hawkes, Adam
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 872
  • [10] China Onshore Oil and Gas Production in 1995
    Yue Dengtai(Senior engineer
    ChinaOil&Gas, 1996, (03) : 148 - 150