Computerized Methodology for Evaluating Drinking Water Treatment Technologies: Part II

被引:0
|
作者
Irene M. C. Lo
Pota A. Alok
机构
[1] The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Kansas State University,Department of Civil Engineering
关键词
adsorber configuration; least cost; multicomponent; liquid phase granular activated carbon adsorption; multicomponent;
D O I
10.1023/A:1005161507826
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The previously described computer based system, Best Available Technology Evaluator (BATE), is used for least cost comparison of AST and AST with GPGAC and LPGAC processes. The underlying LPGAC cost and process dynamics simulation models are complex and need to be modified and coupled in an efficient manner in order to yield useful preliminary design data. This paper discusses a technique for such model combination and a method for finding the LPGAC least cost. Sensitivity analysis of LPGAC cost and performance with respect to common operating parameters such as empty bed contact time (EBCT), hydraulic loading rate (HL), and process configuration is discussed in light of this efficient model combination and least cost finding technique. This study shows that there is an optimal combination of EBCT and LPGAC process configuration for which its cost is comparable to that of AST alone and AST with GPGAC. Such optimal combinations are discussed for some VOC scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 103
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computerized methodology for evaluating drinking water treatment technologies: Part II
    Lo, IMC
    Alok, PA
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2000, 117 (1-4): : 83 - 103
  • [2] Computerized methodology for evaluating drinking water treatment technologies: Part II
    Lo, I.M.C., 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (117): : 1 - 4
  • [3] Computerized Methodology for Evaluating Drinking Water Treatment Technologies: Part I
    Irene M. C. Lo
    Pota A. Alok
    Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2000, 117 : 61 - 81
  • [4] Evaluating the hidden costs of drinking water treatment technologies
    Katya Cherukumilli
    Isha Ray
    Amy J. Pickering
    Nature Water, 2023, 1 (4): : 319 - 327
  • [5] Arsenic removal technologies for drinking water treatment
    Ng K.-S.
    Ujang Z.
    Le-Clech P.
    Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2004, 3 (1) : 43 - 53
  • [6] Editorial: Advanced Treatment Technologies for Drinking Water
    Sun, Wenjun
    Chu, Wenhai
    AQUA-WATER INFRASTRUCTURE ECOSYSTEMS AND SOCIETY, 2021, 70 (08) : III - IV
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF DRINKING WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES TO REMOVE ESTROGENS
    Olejnickova, Z.
    Vavrova, M.
    Caslavsky, J.
    Mega, J.
    Simek, Z.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2015, 16 (03): : 861 - 867
  • [8] Cost scenarios for small drinking water treatment technologies
    Dore, Mohammed H. I.
    Singh, Rajiv G.
    Achari, Gopal
    Khaleghi-Moghadam, Arian
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (16-18) : 3628 - 3638
  • [9] APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES FOR DRINKING WATER TREATMENT IN MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES
    Sorlini, Sabrina
    Rondi, Luca
    Gomez, Andrea Pollmann
    Collivignarelli, Carlo
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 14 (07): : 1721 - 1733
  • [10] Evaluating Nanoparticle Breakthrough during Drinking Water Treatment
    Chalew, Talia E. Abbott
    Ajmani, Gaurav S.
    Huang, Haiou
    Schwab, Kellogg J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 121 (10) : 1161 - 1166