Optimization of alarms: A study on alarm limits, alarm sounds, and false alarms, intended to reduce annoyance

被引:0
|
作者
Block Jr. F.E. [1 ,4 ]
Nuutinen L. [2 ]
Ballast B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Departments of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
[2] Oulu University Central Hospital, Oulu
[3] Groningen University Hospital, Groningen
[4] Department of Anesthesiology, Univ. of Arkansas for Med. Sciences, Mail Slot 515, Little Rock, AR 72205
关键词
Public Health; United States; Operating Room; False Alarm; Mail Survey;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009992830942
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Alarms in the operating room remain a major source of annoyance and confusion. Nearly all alarms result from a transgression of certain alarm limits. We surveyed manufacturers at a major meeting of anesthesiologists for their default alarm limits. We also conducted a mail survey of anesthesiologists in the United States, Finland, and the Netherlands, to learn their chosen alarm limits, reasons for turning off the alarms, and estimates of the number of false alarms. The surveys of medical monitoring manufacturers demonstrated a wide variety of default alarm settings. Anesthesiologists' chosen alarm limits tended to parallel the manufacturers' defaults. Fewer than 30% of anesthesiologists stated that they did not turn off the alarms. The leading reason for turning off alarms was the large number of false alarms. Estimates of the number of false alarms varied from 30% to 76%. The desired role of alarms in anesthetic practice and some suggestions for the general improvement of alarms are discussed.; Alarms in the operating room remain a major source of annoyance and confusion. Nearly all alarms result from a transgression of certain alarm limits. We surveyed manufacturers at a major meeting of anesthesiologists for their default alarm limits. We also conducted a mail survey of anesthesiologists in the United States, Finland, and the Netherlands, to learn their chosen alarm limits, reasons for turning off the alarms, and estimates of the number of false alarms. The surveys of medical monitoring manufacturers demonstrated a wide variety of default alarm settings. Anesthesiologists' chosen alarm limits tended to parallel the manufacturers' defaults. Fewer than 30% of anesthesiologists stated that they did not turn off the alarms. The leading reason for turning off alarms was the large number of false alarms. Estimates of the number of false alarms varied from 30% to 76%. The desired role of alarms in anesthetic practice and some suggestions for the general improvement of alarms are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条