Comparative transcriptomics in human and mouse

被引:0
|
作者
Alessandra Breschi
Thomas R. Gingeras
Roderic Guigó
机构
[1] Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG),
[2] The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology,undefined
[3] Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF),undefined
[4] Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,undefined
来源
Nature Reviews Genetics | 2017年 / 18卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The mouse is the most widely used model organism to study human disease, but often mouse biology cannot be extrapolated to humans. A deep comparison of mouse and human physiology at the molecular level is essential for understanding under which circumstances the mouse can be a suitable model of human biology and for creating better mouse models. Advances in next-generation sequencing technologies fostered genome-wide annotation of functional DNA elements, enabling extensive comparison of the human and mouse genomes.At the transcriptional level, human and mouse gene expression profiles are conserved overall, although the degree of conservation varies depending on the tissues and the genes that are compared. Therefore, the question of whether the human and mouse transcriptomes cluster preferentially by tissue or organ or by species does not have an answer overall, and it depends specifically on the genes being considered.Conservation of expression is not a direct consequence of conservation in regulatory sequences, including promoters and enhancers. Although gene regulatory networks are preserved overall between human and mouse, transcription binding sites are often not conserved.Inter-individual genetic variation can affect human gene expression, but such variation cannot be modelled in inbred strains of laboratory mice because their genetic variation is small compared to the human population. An expansion of the current studies on the relationship between genetic variation and gene expression in outbred mice might provide helpful insights to understand the same relationship in humans.Emerging technologies — such single-cell genomics and single-cell spatial transcriptomics — and time series experiments will improve the annotation of human and mouse genomes, refine the current definitions of homologous cell types and homologous (molecular) phenotypes, and ultimately help scientists to identify which mouse models are the most appropriate to address a given biological question.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 440
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative transcriptomics in human and mouse
    Breschi, Alessandra
    Gingeras, Thomas R.
    Guigo, Roderic
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2017, 18 (07) : 425 - 440
  • [2] Comparative Transcriptomics of Human and Mouse Diabetic Kidney Disease
    Sembach, Frederikke E.
    Ostergaard, Mette V.
    Nielsen, Jens Christian
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Mikkel
    Madsen, Martin R.
    Feldt-Rasmussen, Bo
    Porrini, Esteban
    Hornum, Mads
    Fink, Lisbeth N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 33 (11): : 110 - 110
  • [3] COMPARATIVE TRANSCRIPTOMICS IDENTIFIES PHENOTYPIC SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MOUSE MODELS AND HUMAN SEVERE MALARIA
    Georgiadou, Athina
    Barrio, Pablo Soro
    Dunican, Claire
    Lee, Hyun Jae
    Levin, Michael
    Kaforou, Myrsini
    Cunnington, Aubrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2019, 101 : 8 - 8
  • [4] Novel genetic features of human and mouse Purkinje cell differentiation defined by comparative transcriptomics
    Buchholz, David E.
    Carroll, Thomas S.
    Kocabas, Arif
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Behesti, Hourinaz
    Faust, Phyllis L.
    Stalbow, Lauren
    Fang, Yin
    Hatten, Mary E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (26) : 15085 - 15095
  • [5] Comparative transcriptomics of human diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic mouse wounds reveals limited overlap
    Resnik, Sydney
    Stone, Rivka
    Pastar, Irena
    Grice, Elizabeth
    Tomic-Canic, Marjana
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2020, 28 : S21 - S22
  • [6] Comparative Human and Mouse Kidney Transcriptomics Identify ELF4 as Potential Therapeutic Target
    Hu, Hailong
    Gu, Xiangchen
    Frederick, Julia
    Park, Jihwan
    Shrestha, Rojesh
    Susztak, Katalin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 33 - 33
  • [7] Spatially resolved transcriptomics of human and mouse fibrotic lung
    Franzen, L.
    Lindvall, M. Olsson
    Jackson, S.
    Hamm, G.
    Keith, B.
    Oag, S.
    Collin, A.
    Cann, J.
    Lindgren, J.
    Belfield, G.
    Ollerstam, A.
    Stamou, M.
    Stahl, P.
    Hornberg, J.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [8] Comparative transcriptomics and proteomics of fetal and adult human liver
    Kurbatov L.K.
    Cheglakov I.B.
    Yarygin K.N.
    Sukhikh G.T.
    Vartanian G.V.
    Toropygin I.Yu.
    Archakov A.I.
    Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry, 2008, 2 (3) : 226 - 234
  • [9] COMPARATIVE TRANSCRIPTOMICS OF THREE CANONICAL MOUSE MODELS OF CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE
    Christensen, Michael
    Marstrand-Jorgensen, Adam Bogh
    Sembach, Frederikke Emilie
    Ougaard, Maria
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Mikkel
    Madsen, Martin Ronn
    Bak, Stine
    Jensen, Ditte
    Hansen, Henrik Bjork
    Dalboge, Louise S.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I432 - I433
  • [10] RNA isolation for transcriptomics of human and mouse small skin biopsies
    Bruning O.
    Rodenburg W.
    Radonic T.
    Zwinderman A.H.
    De Vries A.
    Breit T.M.
    De Jong M.
    BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)