Attentional priorities drive effects of time pressure on altruistic choice

被引:0
|
作者
Yi Yang Teoh
Ziqing Yao
William A. Cunningham
Cendri A. Hutcherson
机构
[1] Department of Psychology,
[2] University of Toronto,undefined
[3] Department of Psychology,undefined
[4] The University of Hong Kong,undefined
[5] School of Psychology,undefined
[6] Center for Studies of Psychological Application and Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province,undefined
[7] South China Normal University,undefined
[8] Department of Marketing,undefined
[9] Rotman School of Management,undefined
[10] University of Toronto,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dual-process models of altruistic choice assume that automatic responses give way to deliberation over time, and are a popular way to conceptualize how people make generous choices and why those choices might change under time pressure. However, these models have led to conflicting interpretations of behaviour and underlying psychological dynamics. Here, we propose that flexible, goal-directed deployment of attention towards information priorities provides a more parsimonious account of altruistic choice dynamics. We demonstrate that time pressure tends to produce early gaze-biases towards a person’s own outcomes, and that individual differences in this bias explain how individuals’ generosity changes under time pressure. Our gaze-informed drift-diffusion model incorporating moment-to-moment eye-gaze further reveals that underlying social preferences both drive attention, and interact with it to shape generosity under time pressure. These findings help explain existing inconsistencies in the field by emphasizing the role of dynamic attention-allocation during altruistic choice.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Attentional priorities drive effects of time pressure on altruistic choice
    Teoh, Yi Yang
    Yao, Ziqing
    Cunningham, William A.
    Hutcherson, Cendri A.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [2] Time Pressure and the Compromise and Attraction Effects in Choice
    Lin, Chien-Huang
    Sun, Ya-Chung
    Chuang, Shih-Chieh
    Su, Hung-Jen
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 35, 2008, 35 : 348 - +
  • [3] Attentional Focus Instructions Do Not Affect Choice Reaction Time
    Ziv, Gal
    Lidor, Ronnie
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [4] Effects of attentional behaviours on infant visual preferences and object choice
    Ishikawa, Mitsuhiko
    Yoshimura, Mina
    Sato, Hiroki
    Itakura, Shoji
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2019, 20 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [5] Effects of attentional behaviours on infant visual preferences and object choice
    Mitsuhiko Ishikawa
    Mina Yoshimura
    Hiroki Sato
    Shoji Itakura
    Cognitive Processing, 2019, 20 : 317 - 324
  • [6] The spillover effects of attentional learning on value-based choice
    Gwinn, Rachael
    Leber, Andrew B.
    Krajbich, Ian
    COGNITION, 2019, 182 : 294 - 306
  • [7] TIME PRESSURE AND TEAM PERFORMANCE: AN ATTENTIONAL FOCUS INTEGRATION
    Karau, Steven J.
    Kelly, Janice R.
    TIME IN GROUPS, 2003, 6 : 185 - 212
  • [8] Assessment of Pedophilic Sexual Interest with an Attentional Choice Reaction Time Task
    Andreas Mokros
    Beate Dombert
    Michael Osterheider
    Angelo Zappalà
    Pekka Santtila
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2010, 39 : 1081 - 1090
  • [9] Assessment of Pedophilic Sexual Interest with an Attentional Choice Reaction Time Task
    Mokros, Andreas
    Dombert, Beate
    Osterheider, Michael
    Zappala, Angelo
    Santtila, Pekka
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 39 (05) : 1081 - 1090
  • [10] Measuring the time course of visual attentional shifts in a choice reaction task
    Shih, S-I
    Sperling, G.
    PERCEPTION, 1995, 24 : 44 - 45