Misreporting of program take-up in survey data and its consequences for measuring non-take-up: new evidence from linked administrative and survey data

被引:0
|
作者
Kerstin Bruckmeier
Regina T. Riphahn
Jürgen Wiemers
机构
[1] IAB,
[2] Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg,undefined
来源
Empirical Economics | 2021年 / 61卷
关键词
Take-up; Welfare; Misreporting; Survey data; Administrative data; Data linkage; I32; H75; C81;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The international literature studies non-take-up behavior of eligible populations to evaluate the effectiveness of government programs. A major challenge in this literature is the measurement error regarding benefit take-up. In our data, we observe both actual welfare receipt and respondents’ survey information on their program take-up. This allows us to observe the measurement errors that other researchers must estimate. We describe survey misreporting and investigate how it biases the estimates of the magnitude and patterns of benefit take-up among eligible households. Our findings suggest that the extent of measurement error can be substantial. It varies with the characteristics of the misreporting population and is associated with the drivers of misreporting. This indicates that survey-based analyses of take-up behavior are likely subject to severe biases.
引用
收藏
页码:1567 / 1616
页数:49
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Misreporting of program take-up in survey data and its consequences for measuring non-take-up: new evidence from linked administrative and survey data
    Bruckmeier, Kerstin
    Riphahn, Regina T.
    Wiemers, Juergen
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 61 (03) : 1567 - 1616
  • [2] Measuring take-up of the California EITC with state administrative data
    Iselin, John
    Mackay, Taylor
    Unrath, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2023, 227
  • [3] Welfare receipt misreporting in survey data and its consequences for state dependence estimates: new insights from linked administrative and survey data
    Bruckmeier K.
    Hohmeyer K.
    Schwarz S.
    Journal for Labour Market Research, 2018, 52 (1)
  • [4] A new targeting: A new take-up?: Non-take-up of social assistance in Germany after social policy reforms
    Bruckmeier K.
    Wiemers J.
    Empirical Economics, 2012, 43 (2) : 565 - 580
  • [5] No claim, no pain. Measuring the non-take-up of social assistance using register data
    Bargain, Olivier
    Immervoll, Herwig
    Viitamaki, Heikki
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2012, 10 (03): : 375 - 395
  • [6] No claim, no pain. Measuring the non-take-up of social assistance using register data
    Olivier Bargain
    Herwig Immervoll
    Heikki Viitamäki
    The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2012, 10 : 375 - 395
  • [7] Stigma model of welfare fraud and non-take-up: Theory and evidence from OECD panel data
    Kurita, Kenichi
    Hori, Nobuaki
    Katafuchi, Yuya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2022, 18 (03) : 310 - 338
  • [8] Program Awareness, Administrative Burden, and Non-Take-Up of Quebec's Supplement to the Work Premium
    Daigneault, Pierre-Marc
    Mace, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 43 (06) : 527 - 539
  • [9] Vaccination take-up and health: Evidence from a flu vaccination program for the elderly
    Brilli, Ylenia
    Lucifora, Claudio
    Russo, Antonio
    Tonello, Marco
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 179 : 323 - 341
  • [10] MEDICAID AND MORTALITY: NEW EVIDENCE FROM LINKED SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
    Miller, Sarah
    Johnson, Norman
    Wherry, Laura R.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2021, 136 (03): : 1783 - 1829