“G-Standard”Dutch Patent Act 1995 (Rijksoctrooiwet 1995), Sec. 53(1)(b) – Glaxo v. Pharmachemie

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2014年 / 45卷 / 8期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/s40319-014-0275-y

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The publication of a generic drug in a pharmaceutical database before the expiry date of the patent constitutes an infringement under Art. 53 Dutch Patent Act.The term “to offer” in Art. 53 Dutch Patent Act must be interpreted in a broad sense.

引用

页码：973 / 976

页数：3

共 5 条

[1] “Novelty – All Elements Rule”Patent Act, Sec. 29(1) – Tohr GmbH v. Rohm & Haas Co., Ltd.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (2) : 242 - 242
[2] Comment: Discovery Orders and the Protection of Trade Secrets: “In Camera Proceedings/FOMA” and “KCM v. Viel”: Patent Act, Sec. 105 para. 1
Heath C.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (8) : 997 - 1005
[3] “Misappropriation of Prior Art”Patent Act Sec. 123(1)(vi) – Kato Mfg Co. Ltd. v. Tsukasa Machine Industry Co. Ltd.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (2) : 243 - 243
[4] "Booking.com Sweden" Decision of Court of Appeal (Svea Hovratt Patent-och marknadsoverdomstolen) 9 May 2019-Case No. PMT 7779-18 Booking.com BV and Bookingdotcom Sverige AB v. Visita TFEU, Art. 101(1); Swedish Competition Act, Chap. 2 Sec. 1
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2019, 50 (09) : 1167 - 1175
[5] “Rogers Communications Inc.”Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42, Sec. 3(1)(f) – Rogers Communications Inc., Rogers Wireless Partnership, Shaw Cablesystems G.P., Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Company v. Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada and CMRRA-SONDRAC Inc., Cineplex Entertainment LP, Samuelson-Glushko Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic, Apple Canada Inc. and Apple Inc.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2013, 44 (8) : 978 - 978

← 1 →