A scoping review of continuous quality improvement in healthcare system: conceptualization, models and tools, barriers and facilitators, and impact

被引:11
|
作者
Endalamaw, Aklilu [1 ,2 ]
Khatri, Resham B. [1 ,3 ]
Mengistu, Tesfaye Setegn [1 ,2 ]
Erku, Daniel [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Wolka, Eskinder [6 ]
Zewdie, Anteneh [6 ]
Assefa, Yibeltal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Publ Hlth, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Bahir Dar Univ, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
[3] Hlth Social Sci & Dev Res Inst, Kathmandu, Nepal
[4] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Appl Hlth Econ, Brisbane, Australia
[5] Grifth Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
[6] Int Inst Primary Hlth Care Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Continuous quality improvement; Quality of Care; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; INTERVENTION; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES; PROGRAM; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCREDITATION; PREVENTION; EXPERIENCE; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-10828-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The growing adoption of continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives in healthcare has generated a surge in research interest to gain a deeper understanding of CQI. However, comprehensive evidence regarding the diverse facets of CQI in healthcare has been limited. Our review sought to comprehensively grasp the conceptualization and principles of CQI, explore existing models and tools, analyze barriers and facilitators, and investigate its overall impacts.Methods This qualitative scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. We searched articles in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE databases. In addition, we accessed articles from Google Scholar. We used mixed-method analysis, including qualitative content analysis and quantitative descriptive for quantitative findings to summarize findings and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework to report the overall works.Results A total of 87 articles, which covered 14 CQI models, were included in the review. While 19 tools were used for CQI models and initiatives, Plan-Do-Study/Check-Act cycle was the commonly employed model to understand the CQI implementation process. The main reported purposes of using CQI, as its positive impact, are to improve the structure of the health system (e.g., leadership, health workforce, health technology use, supplies, and costs), enhance healthcare delivery processes and outputs (e.g., care coordination and linkages, satisfaction, accessibility, continuity of care, safety, and efficiency), and improve treatment outcome (reduce morbidity and mortality). The implementation of CQI is not without challenges. There are cultural (i.e., resistance/reluctance to quality-focused culture and fear of blame or punishment), technical, structural (related to organizational structure, processes, and systems), and strategic (inadequate planning and inappropriate goals) related barriers that were commonly reported during the implementation of CQI.Conclusions Implementing CQI initiatives necessitates thoroughly comprehending key principles such as teamwork and timeline. To effectively address challenges, it's crucial to identify obstacles and implement optimal interventions proactively. Healthcare professionals and leaders need to be mentally equipped and cognizant of the significant role CQI initiatives play in achieving purposes for quality of care.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers and Facilitators of Research Finding Utilization in Healthcare: A Scoping Review
    Zareivenovel, Mojgan
    Nemati-Anaraki, Leila
    Asadzandi, Shadi
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 53 (12) : 2646 - 2658
  • [2] Barriers and facilitators to mental healthcare for women veterans: a scoping review
    Godier-McBard, Lauren Rose
    Wood, Abigail
    Kohomange, Manjana
    Cable, Graham
    Fossey, Matt
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 32 (05) : 951 - 961
  • [3] Barriers and Facilitators to Genetic Service Delivery Models: Scoping Review
    Raspa, Melissa
    Moultrie, Rebecca
    Toth, Danielle
    Haque, Saira Naim
    INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (01):
  • [4] The Impact of Continuous Quality Improvement on a System's Healthcare Costs
    Lawless, Stephen T.
    PEDIATRICS, 2016, 137 (04)
  • [5] A scoping review of barriers, facilitators and tools to escalation of care processes in the emergency department
    Matthew Hacker Teper
    Nikki Naghavi
    Laura Pozzobon
    Daniel Lee
    Camilla Parpia
    Ahmed Taher
    Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 24 : 300 - 312
  • [6] A scoping review of barriers, facilitators and tools to escalation of care processes in the emergency department
    Hacker Teper, Matthew
    Naghavi, Nikki
    Pozzobon, Laura
    Lee, Daniel
    Parpia, Camilla
    Taher, Ahmed
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 24 (03) : 300 - 312
  • [7] Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Mental Healthcare in Canada for Black Youth: A Scoping Review
    Fante-Coleman, Tiyondah
    Jackson-Best, Fatimah
    ADOLESCENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 5 (02) : 115 - 136
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators to accessing oral healthcare for older people in the UK: a scoping review
    Beaven, Anna
    Marshman, Zoe
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [9] Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Mental Healthcare in Canada for Black Youth: A Scoping Review
    Tiyondah Fante-Coleman
    Fatimah Jackson-Best
    Adolescent Research Review, 2020, 5 : 115 - 136
  • [10] Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review
    Solomons, Nan M.
    Spross, Judith A.
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2011, 19 (01) : 109 - 120