Study on Treatment Planning for the Prostate in Proton Therapy with Oxygen Enhancement Ratio Effect

被引:0
|
作者
Seung Hoon Yoo
Hui Geng
Wai Wang Lam
Chi Wah Kong
Bin Yang
Tin Lok Chiu
Po Man Wu
Kin Yin Cheung
Siu Ki Yu
Dongho Shin
Byung Jun Min
机构
[1] Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital,Medical Physics and Research Department
[2] National Cancer Center,Proton Therapy Center
[3] Chungbuk National University Hospital,Department of Radiation Oncology
来源
Journal of the Korean Physical Society | 2020年 / 77卷
关键词
OER; Proton therapy; Average model; Voxel model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) effects on treatment planning for a hypoxic prostate tumor with proton scanning beams. Two different OER-based dose calculation models (the average model and the voxel model) were investigated by using hypoxic tumor models in this simulation study. For the hypoxic tumor model, an oxygen distribution with a range of 2.4–9.4 mmHg was used according to the clinical data. The results given by the average model and the voxel model were compared for 50% and 90% tumor control probabilities with variations in the hypoxic tumor volume and fractionation. Comparison between the treatment plans with OER-based higher predicted dose and with the conventional prescription dose was conducted to investigate the organ-at-risk (OAR) doses for the prostate case. The average model showed a higher calculated dose than the voxel model. The voxel model with a 50% control probability showed good agreement with the current prescription dose. The OER values of the average model ranged from 1.05 to 1.25, which were applied to the whole tumor volume in treatment planning. The voxel-model-based OERs were higher (1.50–1.75) than those of average model, and these OERs should be applied only for the hypoxic boost region. Regarding treatment plans, the doses of the rectum and the bladder were reduced to the tolerable range V80Gy (volume receiving equal to or greater than 80Gy) < 15% and V75Gy (volume receiving equal to or greater than 75Gy) < 15% respectively after an optimization, but the maximum dose to femoral heads was higher than 50 Gy. In conclusion, we investigated the possible ranges of the OER (1.3–1.8) for proton-beam treatment of prostate cases. A dose escalation of up to about 1.8 times can be applied for the small hypoxic region. This result, which was obtained using a model study, should be verified through clinical experiment.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 623
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on Treatment Planning for the Prostate in Proton Therapy with Oxygen Enhancement Ratio Effect
    Yoo, Seung Hoon
    Geng, Hui
    Lam, Wai Wang
    Kong, Chi Wah
    Yang, Bin
    Chiu, Tin Lok
    Wu, Po Man
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Yu, Siu Ki
    Shin, Dongho
    Min, Byung Jun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 77 (07) : 613 - 623
  • [2] Treatment of prostate cancer with photon IMRT and proton therapy: a treatment planning comparison
    Trofimov, A.
    Nguyen, P. L.
    Coen, J. J.
    Doppke, K. P.
    Schneider, R. J.
    Adams, J. A.
    Bortfeld, T. R.
    Zietman, A. L.
    DeLaney, T. F.
    Shipley, W. U.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (03): : S389 - S390
  • [3] Robust treatment planning of active scanned proton therapy in prostate cancer
    Park, S.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, J.
    Park, W.
    Ju, S.
    Han, Y.
    Choi, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S307 - S308
  • [4] Treatment planning in proton therapy
    Schwarz, M.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2011, 126 (07): : 1 - 10
  • [5] Treatment planning in proton therapy
    M. Schwarz
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 126
  • [6] Treatment Planning in Proton Therapy
    Winey, B.
    Lomax, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [7] Proton Versus CyberKnife Therapy Planning for Hypofractionated Treatment of Prostate With Focal Boost
    Yeo, Inhwan
    Goughenour, Alexander
    Cernica, George
    Nie, Wei
    Joo, Mindy
    Wang, Peng
    Fan, Jiajin
    Parniani, Ashkan
    Kanani, Samir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2024, 14
  • [8] Feasibility study of extreme hypofractionated proton treatment planning for prostate cancer
    Klinker, P.
    Brouwer, C.
    Roos, C.
    Hammer, C.
    Vanhauten, H.
    Bijmolt, S.
    Langendijk, J.
    Both, S.
    Van den Bergh, A.
    Al-Uwini, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S994 - S995
  • [9] PROTON THERAPY FOR CARCINOMA OF THE NASOPHARYNX - A STUDY IN COMPARATIVE TREATMENT PLANNING
    BROWN, AP
    URIE, MM
    CHISIN, R
    SUIT, HD
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (06): : 1607 - 1614
  • [10] A treatment planning study of urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer
    Yoshimura, Takaaki
    Nishioka, Kentaro
    Hashimoto, Takayuki
    Seki, Kazuya
    Kogame, Shouki
    Tanaka, Sodai
    Kanehira, Takahiro
    Tamura, Masaya
    Takao, Seishin
    Matsuura, Taeko
    Kobashi, Keiji
    Kato, Fumi
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 : 23 - 29