Agronomic performance and sustainability indicators in organic tomato combining different agro-ecological practices

被引:0
|
作者
Mariangela Diacono
Alessandro Persiani
Stefano Canali
Francesco Montemurro
机构
[1] Council for Agricultural Research and Economics – Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment,
[2] CREA-AA,undefined
[3] Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops,undefined
[4] CREA-OF,undefined
来源
关键词
Cover crops; Cover crop termination; Cropping systems sustainability; Energy analysis; Organic processing tomato;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A 2-year field trial was carried out in a climate change context on organic tomato crop. The objectives were: (1) to study the best synergistic combination of a set of agro-ecological techniques, as potential adaptation strategies in Mediterranean environment [i.e.: soil surface shaping; crop rotations; cover crops introduction (barley, vetch and their mixture); cover crop termination techniques (roller crimper—RC vs green manure—GM) and organic fertilization]; (2) to evaluate the sustainability of these techniques by assessing energetic performance. In both years, the barley-RC and mixture-RC combinations reduced weeds fresh and dry weights. In 2014, the combination of commercial organic fertilizer and vetch gave both the highest tomato marketable and total yields (26.88 and 31.97 t ha−1, respectively). In 2015, these production parameters decreased by 30.7 and 35.4%, respectively compared to 2014, and GM-cover crop produced on average more than twice as much as RC-cover crop. The cover crop termination by RC reduced soil mineral N peak than GM treatment, at full flowering in particular in plots after vetch and in the mixture plots in 2014 and 2015 respectively, thus reducing the potential environmental impact by nitrate leaching. The highest energy consuming input was fertilizers (by 57%). The highest energy efficiency and net energy were found in the vetch-GM combination (with low fertilizer input). The research points out that agronomic practices must be fine-tuned to the specific pedoclimatic condition for an efficient use of energy. Moreover, agronomic input reduction is not only feasible, but also creates environmental benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 117
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agronomic performance and sustainability indicators in organic tomato combining different agro-ecological practices
    Diacono, Mariangela
    Persiani, Alessandro
    Canali, Stefano
    Montemurro, Francesco
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2018, 112 (01) : 101 - 117
  • [2] Sustainability of agro-ecological practices in organic horticulture: yield, energy-use and carbon footprint
    Diacono, Mariangela
    Persiani, Alessandro
    Testani, Elena
    Montemurro, Francesco
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 44 (06) : 726 - 746
  • [3] Raising organic: An agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California
    Guthman J.
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2000, 17 (3) : 257 - 266
  • [4] Agro-ecological sustainability evaluation in China
    Dou X.
    Journal of Bioeconomics, 2022, 24 (3) : 223 - 239
  • [5] Agronomic Practices for Musa across Different Agro-ecological Zones in Burundi, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda
    Ocimati, W.
    Karamura, D.
    Rutikanga, A.
    Sivirihauma, C.
    Ndungo, V.
    Ntamwira, J.
    Kamira, M.
    Kanyaruguru, J. -P.
    Blomme, G.
    BANANA SYSTEMS IN THE HUMID HIGHLANDS OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: ENHANCING RESILIENCE AND PRODUCTIVITY, 2013, : 175 - 190
  • [6] Assessing agro-ecological practices using a combination of three sustainability assessment tools
    Landert, Jan
    Pfeifer, Catherine
    Carolus, Johannes
    Schwarz, Gerald
    Albanito, Fabrizio
    Muller, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    Sanders, Juern
    Schader, Christian
    Vanni, Francesco
    Prazan, Jaroslav
    Baumgart, Lukas
    Blockeel, Johan
    Weisshaidinger, Rainer
    Bartel-Kratochvil, Ruth
    Hollaus, Alexander
    Mayer, Andreas
    Hrabalova, Andrea
    Helin, Janne
    Aakkula, Jyrki
    Svels, Kristina
    Guisepelli, Emmanuel
    Smyrniotopoulou, Alexandra
    Vlahos, George
    Iordanidis, Yiannis
    Szilagyi, Alfred
    Podmaniczky, Laszlo
    Balazs, Katalin
    Galioto, Francesco
    Longhitano, Davide
    Rossignolo, Letizia
    Povellato, Andrea
    Zilans, Andis
    Grazvy-das Jegelevicius
    Fratila, Mihaela
    Yoldi, Uxue Iragui
    Massa, Carlos Astrain
    Adrian, Jon Bienzobas
    Sahlin, Kajsa Resare
    Roos, Elin
    Frick, Rebekka
    Bircher, Richard
    Aalders, Inge
    Irvine, Katherine N.
    Kyle, Carol
    Miller, David
    LANDBAUFORSCHUNG-JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AND ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 70 (02): : 129 - 144
  • [7] Integrated sustainability assessment of cropping systems with agro-ecological and economic indicators in northern Italy
    Castoldi, Nicola
    Bechini, Luca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2010, 32 (01) : 59 - 72
  • [8] An integrated sustainability score based on agro-ecological and socioeconomic indicators. A case study of stockless organic farming in Italy
    Migliorini, Paola
    Galioto, Francesco
    Chiorri, Massimo
    Vazzana, Concetta
    AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2018, 42 (08) : 859 - 884
  • [9] Agro-ecological indicators, tools for evaluating cropping systems
    Girardin, P
    Bockstaller, C
    OCL-OLEAGINEUX CORPS GRAS LIPIDES, 1997, 4 (06): : 418 - 426
  • [10] Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems
    Bockstaller, C
    Girardin, P
    vanderWerf, HMG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1997, 7 (1-3) : 261 - 270