Rationale and design of the CAROLINA® - cognition substudy: A randomised controlled trial on cognitive outcomes of linagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

被引:0
|
作者
Biessels G.J. [1 ]
Janssen J. [1 ,2 ]
van den Berg E. [1 ,3 ]
Zinman B. [4 ,5 ]
Espeland M.A. [6 ]
Mattheus M. [7 ]
Johansen O.E. [8 ]
机构
[1] University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, G03.232 Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, GA
[2] University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht
[3] Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Rotterdam
[4] Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital Toronto
[5] Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto
[6] Wake Forest School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC
[7] Boehringer Ingelheim, Global biometrics and datamanagement, Ingelheim
[8] Boehringer Ingelheim, Clinical development, Therapeutic Area Metabolism, Asker
关键词
Cognition; Dementia; Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor; Oral glucose-lowering agent; Type 2 diabetes mellitus;
D O I
10.1186/s12883-018-1014-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with cognitive dysfunction and an increased risk of dementia. Linagliptin is a glucose-lowering agent of the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor class that is of particular interest for the prevention of accelerated cognitive decline, because it may potentially benefit the brain through pleiotropic effects, beyond glucose lowering. This paper presents the design of a study that aims to establish if linagliptin is superior to the sulfonylurea glimepiride in the prevention of accelerated cognitive decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: The cognition substudy is an integral part of the ongoing event-driven, randomised, double blind CARdiOvascular safety of LINAgliptin (CAROLINA®) trial, which evaluates the effect of treatment with linagliptin versus glimepiride on cardiovascular outcomes. CAROLINA® includes patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with sub-optimal glycaemic control at elevated cardiovascular risk. The substudy will evaluate patients randomised and treated who have a baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 24, documented years of formal education with at least one valid cognitive assessment at baseline and during follow-up. The primary cognitive outcome is the occurrence of accelerated cognitive decline at the end of follow-up. The two treatment groups will be compared by using a logistic regression. Accelerated cognitive decline is defined as a rate of cognitive decline that falls at or below the 16th percentile of decline for the whole cohort on either the MMSE or a combined score of the trail making and verbal fluency test. Potential confounders are taken into account at an individual patient level, using a regression based index. Discussion: Between December 2010 and December 2012, 6042 patients were randomised and treated with either linagliptin (5 mg) or glimepiride (1-4 mg) once daily in CAROLINA®. Cognitive tests were conducted in nearly 4500 participants at baseline and are scheduled for two subsequent assessments, after 160 weeks of follow-up and end of follow-up. This substudy of the ongoing CAROLINA® trial will establish if linagliptin is superior to glimepiride in the prevention of accelerated cognitive decline in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Final results are expected in 2019. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT 01243424. © 2018 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rationale and design of the CAROLINA®-cognition substudy: a randomised controlled trial on cognitive outcomes of linagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Biessels, Geert Jan
    Janssen, Jolien
    van den Berg, Esther
    Zinman, Bernard
    Espeland, Mark A.
    Mattheus, Michaela
    Johansen, Odd Erik
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [2] Effects of linagliptin (LINA) versus glimepiride (GLIM) on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: the CAROLINA COGNITION study
    Biessels, G. J.
    Verhagen, C.
    Janssen, J.
    van den Berg, E.
    Passera, A.
    Wallenstein, G.
    Zinman, B.
    Espeland, M. E.
    Johansen, O. E.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2019, 62 : S281 - S282
  • [3] Design and baseline characteristics of the CARdiovascular Outcome Trial of LINAgliptin Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes (CAROLINA®)
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Rosenstock, Julio
    Kahn, Steven E.
    Zinman, Bernard
    Kastelein, John J.
    Lachin, John M.
    Espeland, Mark A.
    Bluhmki, Erich
    Mattheus, Michaela
    Ryckaert, Bart
    Patel, Sanjay
    Johansen, Odd Erik
    Woerle, Hans-Juergen
    DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH, 2015, 12 (03): : 164 - 174
  • [4] Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study
    Geert Jan Biessels
    Chloë Verhagen
    Jolien Janssen
    Esther van den Berg
    Gudrun Wallenstein
    Bernard Zinman
    Mark A. Espeland
    Odd Erik Johansen
    Diabetologia, 2021, 64 : 1235 - 1245
  • [5] Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride on cognitive performance in type 2 diabetes: results of the randomised double-blind, active-controlled CAROLINA-COGNITION study
    Biessels, Geert Jan
    Verhagen, Chloe
    Janssen, Jolien
    van den Berg, Esther
    Wallenstein, Gudrun
    Zinman, Bernard
    Espeland, Mark A.
    Johansen, Odd Erik
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2021, 64 (06) : 1235 - 1245
  • [6] Effect of Linagliptin vs Glimepiride on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The CAROLINA Randomized Clinical Trial
    Rosenstock, Julio
    Kahn, Steven E.
    Johansen, Odd Erik
    Zinman, Bernard
    Espeland, Mark A.
    Woerle, Hans J.
    Pfarr, Egon
    Keller, Annett
    Mattheus, Michaela
    Baanstra, David
    Meinicke, Thomas
    George, Jyothis T.
    von Eynatten, Maximilian
    McGuire, Darren K.
    Marx, Nikolaus
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (12): : 1155 - 1166
  • [7] Effects of linagliptin vs glimepiride stratified by prior insulin secretagogue use in the cardiovascular outcome study of linagliptin versus glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (CAROLINA) trial
    McGuire, D. K.
    Rosenstock, J.
    Johansen, O. E.
    Zinman, B. J.
    Khunti, K.
    Mattheus, M.
    Lund, S. S.
    Espeland, M. A.
    Marx, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 3356 - 3356
  • [8] Microvascular Outcomes after Metabolic Surgery (MOMS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and class I obesity: rationale and design for a randomised controlled trial
    Cohen, Ricardo Vitor
    Pereira, Tiago Veiga
    Aboud, Cristina Mamedio
    de Paris Caravatto, Pedro Paulo
    Zanata Petry, Tarissa Beatrice
    Lopes Correa, Jose Luis
    Schiavon, Carlos Aurelio
    Correa, Mariangela
    Pompilio, Carlos Eduardo
    Quirino Pechy, Fernando Nogueira
    le Roux, Carel
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):
  • [9] Vildagliptin versus insulin as add-on therapy to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a randomised controlled trial
    Strotmann, H. -J.
    Goetze, D.
    Koch, C.
    Forst, T.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S364 - S365
  • [10] Study rationale and design of OPTIMISE, a randomised controlled trial on the effect of benchmarking on quality of care in type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Frank Nobels
    Noëmi Debacker
    Carlos Brotons
    Moses Elisaf
    Michel P Hermans
    Georges Michel
    Erik Muls
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 10