Viable and Nonviable Rural Settlements in the Non-Chernozem Zone of Russia: Plans and Reality

被引:0
|
作者
Smirnov I.P. [1 ]
Smirnova A.A. [1 ]
Tkachenko A.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tver State University, Tver
基金
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
Non-Chernozem zone; resettlement of residents of small villages; small village elimination policy; Tver oblast; viable and nonviable rural settlements;
D O I
10.1134/S2079970520030132
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Abstract—: For the first time in the geographical literature, an attempt is made to review the results of the rural settlement pattern reconstruction policy carried out in the 1960s–1970s. This policy involved the division of rural settlements (RSs) into viable and nonviable. It included the resettlement of people from small villages to large settlements. The article presents data on the plans and results of resettlement of residents of nonviable villages to central farmsteads of collective (kolkhozes) and state (sovkhozes) farms of Kalinin (currently, Tver) oblast. The official list of viable RSs approved in 1977 is analyzed. The structure of this list, distribution of viable settlements in the oblast, and population dynamics of each RS from 1976 to 2010 are considered. It is shown that viable RSs have been selected illogically: many small settlements were included in the list while many large ones were not. Most of the large viable RSs are concentrated in the central part of the oblast. This is its most developed part, the “Tver triangle” (“apexes” coincide with cities Rzhev, Vyshnii Volochek, and Kimry). Analysis of the population dynamics of viable RSs made it possible to identify several variants of population change from 1976 to 2010: from a significant increase to a decrease in the resident population. In general, the dynamics were negative. The population of more than half of the RSs decreased. Most of the viable RSs were successfully developing and gradually increasing their population as long as there were large kolkhozes. Currently, such RSs account for a significant part of the rural development centers. However, the majority of settlements once classified as nonviable still exist. It is concluded that the policy of resettlement and transformation of rural settlement pattern has failed. It is shown that there is an inadequate understanding of the results of this policy in Russian society and the scientific community. The article is intended as a reminder of the uselessness of volitional decisions aimed at radical changes in settlement pattern. © 2020, Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 411
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Labor markets and the role of otkhodnichestvo in the employment of rural inhabitants of Russia's Non-Chernozem Zone
    Averkieva K.V.
    Regional Research of Russia, 2016, 6 (1) : 21 - 31
  • [3] NITROGEN AND AGRICULTURE IN NON-CHERNOZEM ZONE
    PROKOSHEV, VN
    SOVIET SOIL SCIENCE, 1975, 7 (06): : 677 - 689
  • [4] On the Lichen Diversity of Psammophytic Grass Communities in the Southern Non-Chernozem Zone of Russia
    Muchnik, Evgenia E.
    Kupreev, Vadim E.
    Semenishchenkov, Yuri A.
    VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA-BIOLOGIYA, 2023, (62): : 53 - 78
  • [5] Use of growth regulators during introduction of yacon in the Non-Chernozem Zone of Russia
    P. F. Kononkov
    N. V. Sidorova
    Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 37 (3) : 209 - 211
  • [6] Scientific breeding of winter bread wheat in the Non-Chernozem zone of Russia: the history, methods and results
    Sandukhadze, B., I
    Mamedov, R. Z.
    Krakhmalyova, M. S.
    Bugrova, V. V.
    VAVILOVSKII ZHURNAL GENETIKI I SELEKTSII, 2021, 25 (04): : 367 - 373
  • [7] Segetal complex - pioneer stages of syntrophic communities in the Meshchovskiy Opole of the non-Chernozem Zone of Russia
    Burlutskiy, Valeriy A.
    Mazurov, Vladimir N.
    Peliy, Alexander F.
    Semeshkina, Polina S.
    Borodina, Ekaterina S.
    Diop, Ameth
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: COOPERATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY (APEEM 2020), 2020, 169
  • [8] URBAN-RURAL MIGRATION IN THE NON-CHERNOZEM ZONE OF THE RSFSR (WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO VOLOGDA OBLAST)
    ALEKSEYEV, AI
    DANILOVA, IA
    ZUBAREVICH, NV
    NIKULIN, YI
    SOVIET GEOGRAPHY REVIEW AND TRANSLATION, 1980, 21 (05): : 301 - 307
  • [9] SOIL OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS IN NON-CHERNOZEM ZONE OF RSFSR (EUROPEAN PART)
    SOTNIKOV, VP
    FEDORIN, YV
    TYULINA, OV
    SOVIET SOIL SCIENCE, 1976, 8 (03): : 279 - 286
  • [10] Peculiarities of growing gold-of-pleasure for oilseeds and its use in feed production in the non-chernozem zone of Russia
    Vinogradov, D. V.
    Byshov, N., V
    Evtishina, E., V
    Ivanovna, Lupova Ekaterina
    Tunikov, G. M.
    Morozova, N., I
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2018, 7 (16): : 37 - 45