GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5 °C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways

被引:0
|
作者
Keigo Akimoto
Fuminori Sano
Toshimasa Tomoda
机构
[1] Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth,
关键词
Climate change mitigation; Emission pathway; Below 1.5 °C; Mitigation cost;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Paris Agreement of the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change refers to the 1.5 °C target as well as the 2 °C target, and it is important to estimate the emission pathways and mitigation measures for the 1.5 °C target for the discussions on the target. The possible emission pathways vary widely because of the uncertainties involved. We assumed three kinds of temperature trajectories for meeting below 1.5 °C compared with the pre-industrial level, and three numbers for the climate sensitivity. The first trajectory remains below 1.5 °C all the time until 2300, the second overshoots but returns to below 1.5 °C by 2100, and the third overshoots but returns to below 1.5 °C by 2300. There are large differences in terms of 2030 emissions between the estimate from the submitted Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and any of assessed emission pathways involving climate sensitivity of 3.0 °C or higher, and high emission reduction costs were estimated, even for 2030. With climate sensitivity of 2.5 °C, only the third trajectory exhibits consistent emissions in 2030 with the NDCs. However, this case also appears very difficult to achieve, requiring enormous amounts of negative emissions after the middle of this century toward 2300. A climate mitigation strategy aiming for the 1.5 °C target will be debatable, because we face serious difficulties in near- or/and long-term for all the possible emission pathways, and therefore, we should rather focus on actual emission reduction activities than on the 1.5 °C target with poor feasibility.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 852
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5 A°C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways
    Akimoto, Keigo
    Sano, Fuminori
    Tomoda, Toshimasa
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2018, 23 (06) : 839 - 852
  • [2] Assessment of GHG emission pathways consistent with 1.5 °C target
    Masui, Toshihiko
    Nishioka, Shuzo
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (05) : 443 - 445
  • [3] Adjusting Mitigation Pathways to Stabilize Climate at 1.5°C and 2.0°C Rise in Global Temperatures to Year 2300
    Goodwin, Philip
    Brown, Sally
    Haigh, Ivan David
    Nicholls, Robert James
    Matter, Juerg M.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (03) : 601 - 615
  • [4] Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Stehfest, Elke
    Gernaat, David E. H. J.
    van den Berg, Maarten
    Bijl, David L.
    de Boer, Harmen Sytze
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    Doelman, Jonathan C.
    Edelenbosch, Oreane Y.
    Harmsen, Mathijs
    Hof, Andries F.
    van Sluisveld, Mariesse A. E.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (05) : 391 - +
  • [5] Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Elke Stehfest
    David E. H. J. Gernaat
    Maarten van den Berg
    David L. Bijl
    Harmen Sytze de Boer
    Vassilis Daioglou
    Jonathan C. Doelman
    Oreane Y. Edelenbosch
    Mathijs Harmsen
    Andries F. Hof
    Mariësse A. E. van Sluisveld
    Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 391 - 397
  • [6] 1.5°C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways
    Keysser, Lorenz T.
    Lenzen, Manfred
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [7] 1.5 °C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways
    Lorenz T. Keyßer
    Manfred Lenzen
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [8] Emission pathways to achieve 2.0°C and 1.5°C climate targets
    Su, Xuanming
    Takahashi, Kiyoshi
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Tanaka, Katsumasa
    Kato, Etsushi
    Shiogama, Hideo
    Masui, Toshihiko
    Emori, Seita
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2017, 5 (06) : 592 - 604
  • [9] Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5°C
    Millar, Richard J.
    Fuglestvedt, Jan S.
    Friedlingstein, Pierre
    Rogelj, Joeri
    Grubb, Michael J.
    Matthews, H. Damon
    Skeie, Ragnhild B.
    Forster, Piers M.
    Frame, David J.
    Allen, Andmyles R.
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2017, 10 (10) : 741 - +
  • [10] Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C
    Richard J. Millar
    Jan S. Fuglestvedt
    Pierre Friedlingstein
    Joeri Rogelj
    Michael J. Grubb
    H. Damon Matthews
    Ragnhild B. Skeie
    Piers M. Forster
    David J. Frame
    Myles R. Allen
    Nature Geoscience, 2017, 10 : 741 - 747