An Alternative to Cokriging for Situations with Small Sample Sizes

被引:0
|
作者
K. C. Abbaspour
R. Schulin
M. Th. van Genuchten
E. Schläppi
机构
[1] Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,Department of Soil Protection
[2] USDA,U.S. Salinity Laboratory
[3] ARS,undefined
[4] Colombi Schmutz Dorthe AG,undefined
来源
Mathematical Geology | 1998年 / 30卷
关键词
cokriging; small sample size; pedotransfer functions; geostatistics; parameter uncertainty; measurement error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lack of large datasets in soil protection studies and environmental engineering applications may deprive these fields of achieving accurate spatial estimates as derived with geostatistical techniques. A new estimation procedure, with the acronym Co_Est, is presented for situations involving primary and secondary datasets of sizes generally considered too small for geostatistical applications. For these situations, we suggest the transformation of the secondary dataset into the primary one using pedotransfer functions. The transformation will generate a larger set of the primary data which subsequently can be used in geostatistical analyses. The Co_Est procedure has provisions for handling measurement errors in the primary data, estimation errors in the converted secondary data, and uncertainty in the geostatistical parameters. Two different examples were used to demonstrate the applicability of Co_Est. The first example involves estimation of hydraulic conductivity random fields using 42 measured data and 258 values estimated from borehole profile descriptions. The second example consists of estimating chromium concentrations from 50 measured chromium data and 150 values estimated from a relationship between chromium and copper concentrations. The examples indicate that in situations where the size of the primary data is small, Co_Est can produce estimates which are comparable to cokriging estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 274
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An alternative to cokriging for situations with small sample sizes
    Abbaspour, KC
    Schulin, R
    van Genuchten, MT
    Schlappi, E
    MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1998, 30 (03): : 259 - 274
  • [2] Categorical Omega With Small Sample Sizes via Bayesian Estimation: An Alternative to Frequentist Estimators
    Yang, Yanyun
    Xia, Yan
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2019, 79 (01) : 19 - 39
  • [3] Optimal sample sizes for alternative loss functions
    Ghosh, D
    AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION - 1996 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECTION ON SURVEY RESEARCH METHODS, VOLS I AND II, 1996, : 232 - 233
  • [4] IS NOTHING CERTAIN WITH SMALL SAMPLE SIZES
    LERMAN, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1984, 61 (02) : 219 - 220
  • [5] Multivariate Methods and Small Sample Sizes
    Dochtermann, Ned A.
    Jenkins, Stephen H.
    ETHOLOGY, 2011, 117 (02) : 95 - 101
  • [6] Normality Tests for Small Sample Sizes
    Quality Engineering, 7 (01):
  • [7] Normality tests for small sample sizes
    Zylstra, R.R.
    Quality Engineering, 1994, 7 (01)
  • [8] VISUALIZING MEANINGFUL CHANGE IN SMALL SAMPLE SIZES
    Iaconangelo, C.
    McManus, S.
    Serrano, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S527 - S527
  • [9] BEHAVIOR OF THE ZAREMBA TEST FOR SMALL SAMPLE SIZES
    FERRETTI, NE
    FRIDMAN, SM
    MATEMATICA APLICADA E COMPUTACIONAL, 1985, 4 (02): : 157 - 172
  • [10] Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes
    de Winter, J. C. F.
    Dodou, D.
    Wieringa, P. A.
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2009, 44 (02) : 147 - 181