Infrastructure: National Roles Without National Policy

被引:0
|
作者
Wachs, Martin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, City & Reg Planning, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urban Planning, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
infrastructure; public policy; transportation funding;
D O I
10.1177/1087724X211016632
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
In 1992 Professor Dick Netzer posed the question "Do We Really Need a National Infrastructure Policy?" but a national infrastructure policy really is a fanciful notion. America has never had a national infrastructure policy, there is no consensus as to what constitutes "infrastructure," and little to agreement on public policy at the national level. Although we may agree that public expenditures to build and maintain infrastructure should be effective, efficient, and equitable, however hard we try and however sincere our efforts, we never agree on the meanings of terms like infrastructure, policy, effectiveness, efficiency, or equity. The futility of striving toward "a" national or unified infrastructure policy does not, of course, prevent America from pursuing innumerable national infrastructure policies. This essay posits that America can take many practical and important steps to manage and improve its infrastructure regardless of whether it has a document called a "national infrastructure policy."
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 192
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条