Analysis of safety margin of in-vessel retention for AP1000

被引:93
|
作者
Zhang, Y. P. [1 ]
Qiu, S. Z. [1 ]
Su, G. H. [1 ]
Tian, W. X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Nucl Sci & Technol, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
关键词
PHASE-DIAGRAM; POOL; CONVECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.020
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In-vessel retention (IVR) of core melt is a key severe accident management strategy adopted by most operating nuclear power plants and advanced light water reactors (ALWRs), AP600, AP1000, etc. External reactor vessel cooling (ERVC) is a novel severe accident management for IVR analysis. In present study, IVR analysis code in severe accident (IVRASA) has been developed to evaluate the safety margin of IVR in AP1000 with anticipative depressurization and reactor cavity flooding in severe accident. For, IVRASA, the point estimate procedure has been developed for modeling the steady-state endpoint of two core melt configurations: Configuration land Configuration II. The results of benchmark calculations of AP600 by IVRASA were consistent with those of the UCSB and INEEL Then, IVRASA is used to calculate the heat transfer process caused by two core melt configurations of AP1000. The results of calculations of Configuration I indicate that the heat flux remains below the critical heat flux (CHF), however, the sensitivity calculations show that the heat flux in the metallic layer could exceed the CHF because of the focusing effect due to the thin metallic layer. On the other hand, the results of calculations of Configuration II suggest that the thermal failure of the lower head at the bottom location is highly unlikely, but the heat flux in light metallic layer could be higher than that of base case due to the portion of metal partitioning into the lower head. This work also investigated the effect of the uncertainties of the CHF correlations on the analysis of IVR. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2023 / 2033
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Margin Assessment of AP1000 In-vessel Retention Using RELAP5-3D
    Liu, Hsiang Chun
    Lee, Min
    Liang, Thomas K. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND THE ASME 2012 POWER CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 1, 2012, : 647 - 655
  • [2] Analysis of the Availability of In-vessel Retention of Molten Core Debris Strategy for AP1000
    Hui, He
    Pan, Liang-ming
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2014, VOL 5, 2014,
  • [3] The Constructability Analysis of AP1000 Containment Vessel Bottom Head
    Gao Nianci
    Fang Xiaopeng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 6, 2011, : 165 - 170
  • [4] Margin evaluation of in-vessel melt retention for small IPWR
    Jiang, Nan
    Cong, Tenglong
    Peng, Minjun
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 110 : 224 - 235
  • [5] AP1000
    不详
    NUCLEAR PLANT JOURNAL, 2011, 29 (01) : 18 - 18
  • [6] AP1000
    不详
    NUCLEAR PLANT JOURNAL, 2011, 29 (02) : 10 - 10
  • [7] Calculation and analysis of fast neutron fluence of pressure vessel in AP1000 reactor
    Wang, Yue
    Quan, Guoping
    Yee, Yeoh Eing
    Zhu, Cheng-lin
    Yu, Hui
    JOINT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUPERCOMPUTING IN NUCLEAR APPLICATIONS + MONTE CARLO, SNA + MC 2024, 2024, 302
  • [8] Effect of Nu correlation uncertainty on safety margin for passive containment cooling system in AP1000
    Yu, Yu
    Wang, Shengfei
    Niu, Fenglei
    Lai, Yinshan
    Kuang, Zhijin
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2015, 79 : 1 - 7
  • [9] THE CRITICALITY SAFETY ANALYSIS OF AP1000 FUEL ASSEMBLY TRANSPORT PACKAGE
    Wang, Xuexin
    Zhuang, Dajie
    Sun, Hongchao
    Ii, Guoqiang
    Xu, Xiaoxiao
    Zhang, Qun
    Cao, Fangfang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2013, VOL 1, 2014,
  • [10] In-vessel retention analysis for a typical PHWR
    Anuj Kumar Deo
    P. K. Baburajan
    R. Srinivasa Rao
    U. K. Paul
    Avinash J. Gaikwad
    Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering, 2017, 6 (4) : 257 - 264