Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy

被引:242
|
作者
Wirtz, Jochen [1 ]
So, Kevin Kam Fung [2 ]
Mody, Makarand Amrish [3 ]
Liu, Stephanie Q. [4 ]
Chun, HaeEun Helen [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mkt, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ South Carolina, Sch Hotel Restaurant & Tourism Management, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Hospitality Adm, Dept Hospitality Management, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Consumer Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Serv Mkt, Ithaca, NY USA
关键词
Business model; Network effects; Sharing economy; Platforms; Ecosystem; Peer-to-peer; BUSINESS MODEL; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION; AIRBNB; TRUST; FRAMEWORK; MOTIVATIONS; GOVERNANCE; REPUTATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1108/JOSM-11-2018-0369
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine peer-to-peer sharing platform business models, their sources of competitive advantage, and the roles, motivations and behaviors of key actors in their ecosystems. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a conceptual approach that is rooted in the service, tourism and hospitality, and strategy literature. Findings First, this paper defines key types of platform business models in the sharing economy anddescribes their characteristics. In particular, the authors propose the differentiation between sharing platforms of capacity-constrained vs capacity-unconstrained assets and advance five core properties of the former. Second, the authors contrast platform business models with their pipeline business model counterparts to understand the fundamental differences between them. One important conclusion is that platforms cater to vastly more heterogeneous assets and consumer needs and, therefore, require liquidity and analytics for high-quality matching. Third, the authors examine the competitive position of platforms and conclude that their widely taken "winner takes it all" assumption is not valid. Primary network effects are less important once a critical level of liquidity has been reached and may even turn negative if increased listings raise friction in the form of search costs. Once a critical level of liquidity has been reached, a platform's competitive position depends on stakeholder trust and service provider and user loyalty. Fourth, the authors integrate and synthesize the literature on key platform stakeholders of platform businesses (i.e. users, service providers, and regulators) and their roles and motivations. Finally, directions for further research are advanced. Practical implications - This paper helps platform owners, service providers and users understand better the implications of sharing platform business models and how to position themselves in such ecosystems. Originality/value This paper integrates the extant literature on sharing platforms, takes a novel approach in delineating their key properties and dimensions, and provides insights into the evolving and dynamic forms of sharing platforms including converging business models.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 483
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Studying the Effects of Peer-to-Peer Sharing Economy Platforms on Society
    Westerbeek, Jakar
    Ubacht, Jolien
    Van Der Voort, Haiko
    Ten Heuvelhof, Ernst
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION, 2016, 23 : 222 - 232
  • [2] The Sharing Economy Revolution and Peer-to-peer Online Platforms. The Case of Airbnb
    Meleo, Linda
    Romolini, Alberto
    De Marco, Marco
    EXPLORING SERVICES SCIENCE (IESS 2016), 2016, 247 : 561 - 570
  • [3] Tackling Peer-to-Peer Discrimination in the Sharing Economy
    Goel, Naman
    Rutagarama, Maxime
    Faltings, Boi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH ACM CONFERENCE ON WEB SCIENCE, WEBSCI 2020, 2020, : 355 - 361
  • [4] The sharing economy as community marketplace? Trust, reciprocity and belonging in peer-to-peer accommodation platforms
    Celata, Filippo
    Hendrickson, Cary Yungmee
    Sanna, Venere Stefania
    CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 10 (02) : 349 - 363
  • [5] Peer-to-peer sharing platforms with quality differentiation: Manufacturer's strategic decision under sharing economy
    Guan, Huiqi
    Geng, Xin
    Gurnani, Haresh
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 32 (02) : 485 - 500
  • [6] Sharing economy and peer-to-peer accommodation - a perspective paper
    Dolnicar, Sara
    TOURISM REVIEW, 2021, 76 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [7] Vulnerability and perceived risks in the peer-to-peer sharing economy
    Culiberg, Barbara
    Kos Koklic, Mateja
    Kukar-Kinney, Monika
    Vida, Irena
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2024, 48 (02)
  • [8] Sharing economy: peer-to-peer accommodation as a foucauldian heterotopia
    Farmaki, Anna
    Stergiou, Dimitrios P.
    Christou, Prokopis
    TOURISM REVIEW, 2021, 76 (03) : 570 - 578
  • [9] Sharing economy rebound: The case of peer-to-peer sharing of food waste
    Meshulam, Tamar
    Font-Vivanco, David
    Blass, Vered
    Makov, Tamar
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 27 (03) : 882 - 895
  • [10] SHARING THE PIE - AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF REFERRAL REWARD SHARING ON PEER-TO-PEER PLATFORMS
    Dose, David
    Walsh, Gianfranco
    WHAT'S AHEAD IN SERVICE RESEARCH?: NEW PERSPECTIVES FOR BUSINESS AND SOCIETY, 2016, : 925 - 938