Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Blackwell, K. [1 ]
Gascon, P. [2 ]
Jones, C. M. [3 ]
Nixon, A. [4 ]
Krendyukov, A. [5 ]
Nakov, R. [5 ]
Li, Y. [6 ]
Harbeck, N. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Oncol, DUMC, Durham, NC USA
[2] Hosp Gen Valle Hebron, Med Oncol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Jones Clin, Germantown, MD USA
[4] Fowler Family Ctr Canc Care, Jonesboro, AR USA
[5] Hexal AG, Holzkirchen Oberhaching, Germany
[6] Sandoz Inc, Princeton, NJ USA
[7] Univ Munich LMU, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Breast Ctr, Munich, Germany
[8] Univ Munich LMU, CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
关键词
pegfilgrastim; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; biosimilar; breast cancer; neutropenia; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; INDUCED FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; DAILY FILGRASTIM; PHASE-III; CHEMOTHERAPY; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; MULTICENTER; DOXORUBICIN; DOCETAXEL;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdx303
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Following the functional and physicochemical characterization of a proposed biosimilar, comparative clinical studies help to confirm biosimilarity by demonstrating similar safety and efficacy to the reference product in a sensitive patient population. Patients and methods: LA-EP2006 is a proposed biosimilar that has been developed for pegfilgrastim, a long-acting form of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the prevention of neutropenia. The current analysis reports data pooled from two independent, multinational, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind phase III studies of similar design comparing the safety and efficacy of reference pegfilgrastim with LA-EP2006 in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic (neo) adjuvant TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy and requiring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Results: A total of 624 patients were randomized in the PROTECT-1 and PROTECT-2 studies (NCT01735175; NCT01516736) (LA-EP2006: n = 314; reference: n = 310). Baseline characteristics of patients were well balanced across treatment groups. The primary end point, mean duration of severe neutropenia in the first chemotherapy cycle was similar in both the LA-EP2006 and reference groups (1.0561.055 days versus 1.0160.958 days), with a treatment difference of -0.04 days [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.19 to 0.11] that met the equivalence criteria (the 95% CI were within the defined margin of 61 day). Secondary end points, such as the nadir of absolute neutrophil count and the incidence of febrile neutropenia, were also similar between LA-EP2006 and reference pegfilgrastim. The safety and tolerability profile of LA-EP2006 was similar to that observed with reference pegfilgrastim, and there were no reports of neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This pooled analysis confirms, as a part of totality of evidence approach, that the proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim LA-EP2006 has a comparable efficacy and safety profile to reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving TAC chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:2272 / 2277
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind trials comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer
    Blackwell, Kimberly
    Gascon, Pedro
    Jones, C. Michael
    Nixon, Allen
    Nakov, Roumen
    Singh, Pritibha
    Krendyukov, Andriy
    Harbeck, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [2] Randomized, double-blind study comparing proposed biosimilar LA-EP2006 with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Lipatov, Oleg
    Frolova, Mona
    Udovitsa, Dmitry
    Topuzov, Eldar
    Ganea-Motan, Doina Elena
    Nakov, Roumen
    Singh, Pritibha
    Rudy, Anita
    Blackwell, Kimberly
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 (11) : 1359 - 1367
  • [3] Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) compared with reference pegfilgrastim in breast cancer: Pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind, phase III trials
    Blackwell, K.
    Gascon, P.
    Jones, C. M.
    Nixon, A.
    Nakov, R.
    Mo, M.
    Krendyukov, A.
    Nadia, H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [4] Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) compared with reference pegfilgrastim in Asian patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy: Pooled subgroup analysis of two randomized trials
    Harbeck, N.
    Gascon, P.
    Jones, C. M.
    Nixon, A.
    Krendyukov, A.
    Nakov, R.
    Mo, M.
    Blackwell, K. L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [5] A randomized, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) with reference pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer (PROTECT1)
    Harbeck, N.
    Zbarskaya, I.
    Lipatov, O.
    Frolova, M.
    Udovitsa, D.
    Topuzov, E.
    Ganea-Motan, D. E.
    Nakov, R.
    Singh, P.
    Rudy, A.
    Blackwell, K.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [6] Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) compared with reference pegfilgrastim in Asian patients with breast cancer: an exploratory comparison from two Phase III trials
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Gascon, Pere
    Jones, Clyde M.
    Nixon, Allen
    Krendyukov, Andriy
    Nakov, Roumen
    Li, Yuhan
    Blackwell, Kimberly
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (16) : 1385 - 1393
  • [7] Proposed Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006) and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Protect 2: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (supportive care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment Results
    Blackwell, Kimberley
    Paltuev, Ruslan
    Donskih, Roman
    Burdaeva, Olga
    Bit-Sava, Elena
    Maksud, Tanveer
    Jones, Michael
    Nixon, Allen
    Vidal, Maria J.
    Nakov, Roumen
    Singh, Pritba
    Schaffer, Gregor
    Gascon, Pere
    Harbeck, Nadia
    BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [8] Proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim LA-EP2006 shows similarity in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to reference pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects
    Nakov, Roumen
    Gattu, Sreekanth
    Wang, Jessie
    Velinova, Maria
    Skerjanec, Andrej
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [9] A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar LA-EP2006 and Reference Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Pegfilgrastim Randomized Oncology (Supportive Care) Trial to Evaluate Comparative Treatment (PROTECT-2), a Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
    Blackwell, Kimberly
    Donskih, Roman
    Jones, C. Michael
    Nixon, Allen
    Vidal, Maria J.
    Nakov, Roumen
    Singh, Pritibha
    Schaffar, Gregor
    Gascon, Pere
    Harbeck, Nadia
    ONCOLOGIST, 2016, 21 (07): : 789 - 794
  • [10] Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a Proposed Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar MSB11455 Versus the Reference Pegfilgrastim Neulasta in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial
    Lickliter, Jason
    Kanceva, Radmila
    Vincent, Emmanuelle
    Schueler, Armin
    Harrison-Moench, Eleanor
    Yue, Corinne Seng
    Stahl, Michael
    Ullmann, Martin
    Ghori, Vishal
    Griffin, Paul
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 42 (08) : 1508 - +