Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention With Follow-up vs Usual Care of Suicidal Patients Treated in the Emergency Department

被引:365
|
作者
Stanley, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Gregory K. [3 ]
Brenner, Lisa A. [4 ,5 ]
Galfalvy, Hanga C. [1 ,2 ]
Currier, Glenn W. [6 ]
Knox, Kerry L. [7 ,8 ]
Chaudhury, Sadia R. [1 ,2 ]
Bush, Ashley L. [3 ]
Green, Kelly L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Rocky Mt Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Care, Dept Vet Affairs, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[6] Univ S Florida, Dept Psychiat, Tampa, FL USA
[7] Univ Rochester, Dept Psychiat, Rochester, NY USA
[8] Ctr Excellence Suicide Prevent, Vet Integrated Serv Networks 2, Dept Vet Affairs, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SELF-HARM; PREVENTION; RISK; CONTRACTS; ADOLESCENTS; ATTENDANCE; CONTACT;
D O I
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Suicidal behavior is a major public health problem in the United States. The suicide rate has steadily increased over the past 2 decades; middle-aged men and military veterans are at particularly high risk. There is a dearth of empirically supported brief intervention strategies to address this problem in health care settings generally and particularly in emergency departments (EDs), where many suicidal patients present for care. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the Safety Planning Intervention (SPI), administered in EDs with follow-up contact for suicidal patients, was associated with reduced suicidal behavior and improved outpatient treatment engagement in the 6 months following discharge, an established high-risk period. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cohort comparison design with 6-month follow-up at 9 EDs (5 intervention sites and 4 control sites) in Veterans Health Administration hospital EDs. Patients were eligible for the study if they were 18 years or older, had an ED visit for a suicide-related concern, had inpatient hospitalization not clinically indicated, and were able to read English. Data were collected between 2010 and 2015; data were analyzed between 2016 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS The intervention combines SPI and telephone follow-up. The SPI was defined as a brief clinical intervention that combined evidence-based strategies to reduce suicidal behavior through a prioritized list of coping skills and strategies. In telephone follow-up, patients were contacted at least 2 times to monitor suicide risk, review and revise the SPI, and support treatment engagement. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Suicidal behavior and behavioral health outpatient services extracted from medical records for 6 months following ED discharge. RESULTS Of the 1640 total patients, 1186 were in the intervention group and 454 were in the comparison group. Patients in the intervention group had a mean (SD) age of 47.15 (14.89) years and 88.5% were men (n = 1050); patients in the comparison group had a mean (SD) age of 49.38 (14.47) years and 88.1% were men (n = 400). Patients in the SPI+ condition were less likely to engage in suicidal behavior (n = 36 of 1186; 3.03%) than those receiving usual care (n = 24 of 454; 5.29%) during the 6-month follow-up period. The SPI+ was associated with 45% fewer suicidal behaviors, approximately halving the odds of suicidal behavior over 6 months (odds ratio. 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.95, P = .03). Intervention patients had more than double the odds of attending at least 1 outpatient mental health visit (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.57-2.71; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This large-scale cohort comparison study found that SPI+ was associated with a reduction in suicidal behavior and increased treatment engagement among suicidal patients following ED discharge and may be a valuable clinical tool in health care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 900
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Staff Views of an Emergency Department Intervention Using Safety Planning and Structured Follow-Up with Suicidal Veterans
    Chesin, Megan S.
    Stanley, Barbara
    Haigh, Emily A. P.
    Chaudhury, Sadia R.
    Pontoski, Kristin
    Knox, Kerry L.
    Brown, Gregory K.
    ARCHIVES OF SUICIDE RESEARCH, 2017, 21 (01) : 127 - 137
  • [2] Safety planning intervention and follow-up: A telehealth service model for suicidal individuals in emergency department settings: Study design and protocol
    Brown, Gregory K.
    Wolk, Courtney Benjamin
    Green, Kelly L.
    Nezir, Freya
    Mowery, Danielle L.
    Gallop, Robert
    Reilly, Megan E.
    Stanley, Barbara
    Mandell, David S.
    Oquendo, Maria A.
    Jager-Hyman, Shari
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 140
  • [3] An Emergency Department Intervention for Linking Pediatric Suicidal Patients to Follow-Up Mental Health Treatment
    Asarnow, Joan Rosenbaum
    Baraff, Larry J.
    Berk, Michele
    Grob, Charles S.
    Devich-Navarro, Mona
    Suddath, Robert
    Piacentini, John C.
    Rotheram-Borus, Mary Jane
    Cohen, Daniel
    Tang, Lingqi
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2011, 62 (11) : 1303 - 1309
  • [4] Intensive intervention improves primary care follow-up for uninsured emergency department patients
    Horwitz, SM
    Busch, SH
    Balestracci, KMB
    Ellingson, KD
    Rawlings, J
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (07) : 647 - 652
  • [5] Brief Intervention and Follow-Up for Suicidal Patients With Repeat Emergency Department Visits Enhances Treatment Engagement
    Stanley, Barbara
    Brown, Gregory K.
    Currier, Glenn W.
    Lyons, Chelsea
    Chesin, Megan
    Knox, Kerry L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 105 (08) : 1570 - 1572
  • [6] Use of a Bidirectional Text Messaging System for Emergency Department Follow-Up Versus Usual Follow-Up
    Obr, Brooks J.
    Young, Tracy
    Harland, Karisa K.
    Nugent, Andrew
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2020, 26 (06) : 760 - 768
  • [7] Implementing an Emergency Department Telephone Follow-Up Program for Suicidal Patients: Successes and Challenges
    Catanach, Brittany
    Betz, Marian E.
    Tvrdy, Charissa
    Skelding, Cheri
    Brummett, Sarah
    Allen, Michael H.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2019, 45 (11): : 725 - 732
  • [8] Primary and Specialty Care Follow-Up for Uninsured Emergency Department Patients
    Ginde, A. A.
    Talley, B. E.
    Trent, S. A.
    Raja, A. S.
    Sullivan, A. F.
    Camargo, Jr C. A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 54 (03) : S75 - S75
  • [9] Emergency department follow-up of hospitalized patients
    Wogan, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (04): : 510 - 511
  • [10] FOLLOW-UP CARE FOR EMERGENCY PATIENTS
    RODENBERG, H
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 85 (07) : 746 - 747