Publication bias in entrepreneurship research: An examination of dominant relations to performance

被引:19
|
作者
O'Boyle, Ernest H., Jr. [1 ]
Rutherford, Matthew W. [2 ]
Banks, George C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Business, Dept Management, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Longwood Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Farmville, VA 23909 USA
关键词
Publication Bias; Meta-analysis; Performance; METAANALYSIS; FUTURE; TRIALS; EMERGENCE; ARTICLES; TRENDS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.10.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Publication bias (PB) exists when the published literature is not representative of the population of studies. PB has largely been ignored or dismissed in entrepreneurship research as there is a general belief that only fields entrenched in dominant theoretical paradigms are capable of suffering from PB. We tested this presumption by re-analyzing the results of 15 systematic reviews (i.e., meta-analyses) of entrepreneurial antecedents and firm performance. Using three different tests, we found some degree of PB in all but three of these analyses. Our results belie the contention that entrepreneurship is immune to PB. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 784
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条