Hybrid Two-Component Sensors for Identification of Bacterial Chemoreceptor Function

被引:16
|
作者
Luu, Rita A. [1 ,4 ]
Schomer, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Brunton, Ceanne N. [1 ,5 ]
Truong, Richard [1 ,6 ]
Ta, Albert P. [1 ,7 ]
Tan, Watumesa A. [1 ,8 ]
Parales, Juanito, V [1 ]
Wang, Yu-Jing [3 ]
Huo, Yu-Wen [3 ]
Liu, Shuang-Jiang [3 ]
Ditty, Jayna L. [2 ]
Stewart, Valley [1 ]
Parales, Rebecca E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Coll Biol Sci, Dept Microbiol & Mol Genet, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ St Thomas, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Biol, St Paul, MN USA
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Microbiol, State Key Lab Microbial Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] List Biol Labs Inc, Campbell, CA USA
[5] Novozymes, Davis, CA USA
[6] BioMarin Pharmaceut Inc, Novato, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Physiol & Biophys, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[8] Atma Jaya Catholic Univ Indonesia, Fac Biotechnol, Jakarta, Indonesia
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Pseudomonas putida; biosensor; methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein; receptor; two-component system; PSEUDOMONAS-PUTIDA F1; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; ENERGY TAXIS; CYTOSINE CHEMORECEPTOR; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; REGULATORY SYSTEMS; HAMP LINKER; CHEMOTAXIS; NITRATE; NARX;
D O I
10.1128/AEM.01626-19
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Soil bacteria adapt to diverse and rapidly changing environmental conditions by sensing and responding to environmental cues using a variety of sensory systems. Two-component systems are a widespread type of signal transduction system present in all three domains of life and typically are comprised of a sensor kinase and a response regulator. Many two-component systems function by regulating gene expression in response to environmental stimuli. The bacterial chemotaxis system is a modified two-component system with additional protein components and a response that, rather than regulating gene expression, involves behavioral adaptation and results in net movement toward or away from a chemical stimulus. Soil bacteria generally have 20 to 40 or more chemoreceptors encoded in their genomes. To simplify the identification of chemoeffectors (ligands) sensed by bacterial chemoreceptors, we constructed hybrid sensor proteins by fusing the sensor domains of Pseudomonas putida chemoreceptors to the signaling domains of the Escherichia coli NarX/NarQ nitrate sensors. Responses to potential attractants were monitored by beta-galactosidase assays using an E. coli reporter strain in which the nitrate-responsive narG promoter was fused to lacZ. Hybrid receptors constructed from PcaY, McfR, and NahY, which are chemoreceptors for aromatic acids, tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, and naphthalene, respectively, were sensitive and specific for detecting known attractants, and the beta-galactosidase activities measured in E. coli correlated well with results of chemotaxis assays in the native P. putida strain. In addition, a screen of the hybrid receptors successfully identified new ligands for chemoreceptor proteins and resulted in the identification of six receptors that detect propionate. IMPORTANCE Relatively few of the thousands of chemoreceptors encoded in bacterial genomes have been functionally characterized. More importantly, although methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, the major type of chemoreceptors present in bacteria, are easily identified bioinformatically, it is not currently possible to predict what chemicals will bind to a particular chemoreceptor. Chemotaxis is known to play roles in biodegradation as well as in host-pathogen and host-symbiont interactions, but many studies are currently limited by the inability to identify relevant chemoreceptor ligands. The use of hybrid receptors and this simple E. coli reporter system allowed rapid and sensitive screening for potential chemoeffectors. The fusion site chosen for this study resulted in a high percentage of functional hybrids, indicating that it could be used to broadly test chemoreceptor responses from phylogenetically diverse samples. Considering the wide range of chemical attractants detected by soil bacteria, hybrid receptors may also be useful as sensitive biosensors.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bacterial two-component systems as sensors for synthetic biology applications
    Lazar, John T.
    Tabor, Jeffrey J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2021, 28
  • [2] Kinetic Buffering of Cross Talk between Bacterial Two-Component Sensors
    Groban, Eli S.
    Clarke, Elizabeth J.
    Salis, Howard M.
    Miller, Susan M.
    Voigt, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2009, 390 (03) : 380 - 393
  • [3] Hybrid Two-Component Breather
    G. T. Adamashvili
    Optics and Spectroscopy, 2021, 129 : 1055 - 1062
  • [4] Hybrid Two-Component Breather
    Adamashvili, G. T.
    OPTICS AND SPECTROSCOPY, 2021, 129 (09) : 1055 - 1062
  • [5] Identification of Gold Sensing Peptide by Integrative Proteomics and a Bacterial Two-Component System
    Ng, I-Son
    Yu, You-Jin
    Yi, Ying-Chen
    Tan, Shih-I
    Huang, Bo-Chuan
    Han, Yin-Lung
    FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY, 2017, 5
  • [6] An atlas of bacterial two-component systems reveals function and plasticity in signal transduction
    Xie, Yingpeng
    Li, Jingwei
    Ding, Yiqing
    Shao, Xiaolong
    Sun, Yue
    Xie, Fangzhou
    Liu, Shiyi
    Tang, Shaojun
    Deng, Xin
    CELL REPORTS, 2022, 41 (03):
  • [7] BACTERIAL TWO-COMPONENT SYSTEMS AS ANTIMICROBIAL TARGETS
    Yamamoto, N.
    Rosales-Hurtado, M.
    Ogawa-Okada, M.
    Benfodda, Z.
    Meffre, P.
    Szurmant, H.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 68 : A87 - A88
  • [8] Regulation of Bacterial Two-Component Systems by Cardiolipin
    Yeo, Won-Sik
    Dyzenhaus, Sophie
    Torres, Victor J.
    Brinsmade, Shaun R.
    Bae, Taeok
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2023, 91 (04)
  • [9] Evolutionary Characteristics of Bacterial Two-Component Systems
    Sheng, Xia
    Huvet, Maxime
    Pinney, Johnw.
    Stumpf, Michael P. H.
    EVOLUTIONARY SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2012, 751 : 121 - 137
  • [10] Regulation of bacterial virulence by two-component systems
    Beier, D
    Gross, R
    CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 9 (02) : 143 - 152