Complications of Outpatient and Inpatient Renal Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Lin, Shih-Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Cherry Yin-Yi [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lin, Cheng-Chieh [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Hsu, Wu-Huei [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Liu, I-Wen [5 ]
Lin, Chia-Der [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Kao, Chia-Hung [1 ,2 ,10 ,11 ,12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Biomed Sci, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[2] China Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[3] China Med Univ Hosp, Div Nephrol, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Kidney Inst, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Teaching, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[6] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[7] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Family Med, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[8] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Chest Med, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[9] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[10] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[11] China Med Univ Hosp, PET Ctr, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[12] Asia Univ, Dept Bioinformat & Med Engn, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[13] China Med Univ Hosp, Ctr Augmented Intelligence Healthcare, Taichung 404, Taiwan
关键词
outpatient; inpatient; renal biopsies; systematic review;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics11040651
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The evidence indicates that the optimal observation period following renal biopsy ranges between 6 and 8 h. This systematic review and meta-analysis explored whether differences exist in the complication rates of renal biopsies performed in outpatient and inpatient settings. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1985 to February 2020. Two reviewers independently selected studies evaluating the bleeding risk from renal biopsies performed in outpatient and inpatient settings and reviewed their full texts. The primary and secondary outcomes were risks of bleeding and major events (including mortality) following the procedure, respectively. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the original study design (i.e., prospective or retrospective). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effect meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-2 test. Results: Data from all 10 eligible studies, which included a total of 1801 patients and 203 bleeding events, were included for analysis. Renal biopsies in outpatient settings were not associated with a higher bleeding risk than those in inpatient settings (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.11; I-2 = 0%). The risk of major events was also comparable across both groups (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.16-1.29; I-2 = 4%). Conclusions: Similar rates of bleeding and major events following renal biopsy in outpatient and inpatient settings were observed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outpatient vs inpatient parotidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Benito, Daniel A.
    Pasick, Luke J.
    Bestourous, Daniel
    Thakkar, Punam
    Goodman, Joseph F.
    Joshi, Arjun S.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (02): : 668 - 678
  • [2] Outpatient versus inpatient thyroidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Chin, Christopher J.
    Hong, Chris J.
    Perera, Stefan
    Witterick, Ian J.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (01): : 192 - 202
  • [3] Outpatient versus Inpatient Parotidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Forner, David
    Lee, Daniel J.
    Walsh, Chris
    Witterick, Ian J.
    Taylor, S. Mark
    Freeman, Jeremy
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 162 (06) : 818 - 825
  • [4] Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications
    Xu, Joshua
    Cao, Jacob Y.
    Chaggar, Gurpreet S.
    Negus, Jonathan J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2020, 17 : 38 - 43
  • [5] Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Susan Dong
    Maria Khan
    Farahnosh Hashimi
    Caroline Chamy
    Rohan D’Souza
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [6] Outpatient Hysterectomy versus Inpatient Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ellinides, Andreas
    Manolopoulos, Philip P.
    Hajymiri, Melika
    Sergentanis, Theodoros N.
    Trompoukis, Pantelis
    Ntourakis, Dimitrios
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (01) : 23 - +
  • [7] Outpatient vs Inpatient Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Martin, Rafael R. H.
    Bogdanovski, Anastasia
    Gomez-Mayorga, Jorge L.
    Abedin, Iman
    Bain, Paul A.
    Hu-Bianco, Qing L.
    James, Benjamin C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S133 - S133
  • [8] Inpatient Versus Outpatient Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    D'Souza, Rohan D.
    Khan, Maria
    Hashimi, Farahnosh
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 67S - 67S
  • [9] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Native Kidney Biopsy Complications
    Poggio, Emilio D.
    McClelland, Robyn L.
    Blank, Kristina N.
    Hansen, Spencer
    Bansal, Shweta
    Bomback, Andrew S.
    Canetta, Pietro A.
    Khairallah, Pascale
    Kiryluk, Krzysztof
    Lecker, Stewart H.
    McMahon, Gearoid M.
    Palevsky, Paul M.
    Parikh, Samir
    Rosas, Sylvia E.
    Tuttle, Katherine
    Vazquez, Miguel A.
    Vijayan, Anitha
    Rovin, Brad H.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 15 (11): : 1595 - 1602
  • [10] Outcomes of Outpatient Versus Inpatient Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mustafa, Mohammed
    Babiker, Mohamed
    Abusin, Fatema
    Mohammed, Tamador
    Awadalla, Tarig
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)