Failure to rescue the elderly: a superior quality metric for trauma centers

Trauma centers require reliable metrics to better compare the quality of care delivered. We compared mortality after a reported complication, termed failure to rescue (FTR), and FTR in the elderly (age > 65 years) (FTRE) to determine which is a superior metric to assess quality of care delivered by trauma centers. This was a retrospective review of the National Trauma Databank (NTDB) research data sets 2010 and 2011. Patients ae<yen>16 years admitted to centers reporting ae<yen>80% of AIS and/or ae<yen> 20% of comorbidities with > 200 subjects in the NTDB were selected. Centers were classified based on the rate of FTR and FTRE (< 5 vs. 5-14 vs. ae<yen>15%). The primary outcome was adjusted mortality for each group of trauma centers based on FTR and FTRE classifications. The overall mean +/- SD FTR rate was 7.2 +/- 5.2% and FTRE was 10.4 +/- 7.9%. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for mortality was not different when centers with FTR < 5% were compared to those with FTR of 5-14 or ae<yen>15%. In contrast, a stepwise increase in FTRE predicted a significantly higher mortality when centers with FTRE 5% were compared to those with 5-14% (AOR: 1.05, p = 0.031) and ae<yen>15% (AOR: 1.13, p < 0.001). Similarly, stepwise increase in FTRE predicted higher adjusted mortality for severely and critically injured patients, whereas FTR did not. Higher FTRE predicts increased adjusted mortality better than FTR after trauma and should, therefore, be considered an important metric when comparing quality care delivered by trauma centers.