Effect of acidic pH on surface roughness of esthetic dental materials

被引:43
|
作者
Alnasser, Muhsen [1 ]
Finkelman, Matthew [2 ]
Papathanasiou, Aikaterini [3 ]
Suzuki, Marcelo [3 ]
Ghaffari, Ruby [4 ]
Ali, Ala [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Dent & Biomat Sci, Adv Grad Educ Implantol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Serv, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Comprehens Care, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2019年 / 122卷 / 06期
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; PORCELAIN; CERAMICS; PROFILOMETRY; DURABILITY; MICROSCOPY; CORROSION; EROSION; ENAMEL; GLASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.022
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Exposure to gastric acid in patients with bulimia nervosa and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes demineralization of hard tooth structures. This chemical attack also causes the degradation of dental ceramics, which results in increased surface roughness and reduced strength. However, studies comparing the effect of acidic pH on resin matrix ceramic with other computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) esthetic materials are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the surface roughness changes of different CAD-CAM restorative dental materials after exposure to acidic pH by using a 3D optical interferometer. Material and method. Five esthetic CAD-CAM block materials, a leucite glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD), a zirconia (BruxZir Solid Zirconia), a resin matrix ceramic (VITA Enamic), a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), and a feldspathic porcelain (VITABLOCS Mark II CAD) were tested. Eighteen specimens were sectioned from CAD-CAM blocks into 2-mm-thick rectangular plates and immersed in 10 mL of 5% hydrochloric acid (HCI) with (pH=2) at 37 degrees C for 45 and 91 hours. The surface roughness average (Ra) of the specimens was measured by using a 3D optical interferometer before the storage period (baseline), after 45 hours, and after 91 hours of exposure to HCI. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the post hoc Dunn test with Bonferroni correction (alpha=.05). Result. Regarding the comparison of surface roughness changes at different periods of evaluation (baseline, 45 hours, 91 hours), there were no statistically significant differences for lithium disilicate (P=.063) or zirconia (P=.513). Leucite glass-ceramic, feldspathic porcelain, and the resin matrix ceramic demonstrated statistically significant differences (P<.001). For all tests that were statistically significant, greater surface roughness was found at the time point with the longer HCI exposure. Regarding the comparison of materials in terms of change in surface roughness between baseline to 45 hours and baseline to 91 hours, the Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a statistically significant difference among the materials in both cases (P<.001). Lithium disilicate and zirconia exhibited the least change in surface roughness among the 5 materials. Conclusion. Leucite glass-ceramic, feldspathic porcelain, and resin matrix ceramic showed statistically significant increases in surface roughness when they were exposed to simulated gastric acid for 45 and 91 hours. Lithium disilicate and zirconia showed no statistically significant change in surface roughness after exposure to HCl for 45 and 91 hours.
引用
收藏
页码:567.e1 / 567.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials
    Neme, AL
    Frazier, KB
    Roeder, LB
    Debner, TL
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2002, 27 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [2] Influence of brushing on surface roughness of the esthetic materials.
    Sobrinho, LC
    Francisco, MU
    Consani, S
    Sinhoreti, MAC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1093 - 1093
  • [3] Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness
    Awad, Daniel
    Stawarczyk, Bogna
    Liebermann, Anja
    Ilie, Nicoleta
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (06): : 534 - 540
  • [4] Effect of a Glaze/Composite Sealant on the 3-D Surface Roughness of Esthetic Restorative Materials
    Perez, C. R.
    Hirata, R., Jr.
    Silva, A. H. M. F. T.
    Sampaio, E. M.
    Miranda, M. S.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 34 (06) : 674 - 680
  • [5] Effects of fluoride varnishes on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Wetmore, ML
    Warren, DP
    Powers, JM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 364 - 364
  • [6] Evaluation of surface roughness of esthetic materials submitted to surface seating and bleaching agent.
    Borges, ALS
    Araujo, RM
    Valera, MC
    Araujo, MAM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B174 - B174
  • [7] The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials
    Türkün, LS
    Türkün, M
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2004, 29 (02) : 203 - 211
  • [8] Effect of Antiasthmatic Medication on the Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Dental Restorative Materials
    Ayaz, Elif Aydogan
    Bagis, Bora
    Turgut, Sedanur
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2014, 23 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [9] Effects of Dental Bleaching Agents on the Surface Roughness of Dental Restoration Materials
    Popescu, Alexandru Dan
    Tuculina, Mihaela Jana
    Diaconu, Oana Andreea
    Gheorghita, Lelia Mihaela
    Nicolicescu, Claudiu
    Cumpata, Cristian Niky
    Petcu, Cristiana
    Abdul-Razzak, Jaqueline
    Rica, Ana Maria
    Voinea-Georgescu, Ruxandra
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (06):
  • [10] Prophylactic polishing agents affect surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.
    Debner, TL
    Neme, AL
    Frazier, KB
    Roeder, LB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 278 - 278