Process-Based Climate Model Development Harnessing Machine Learning: I. A Calibration Tool for Parameterization Improvement

被引:45
|
作者
Couvreux, Fleur [1 ]
Hourdin, Frederic [2 ]
Williamson, Daniel [3 ,5 ]
Roehrig, Romain [1 ]
Volodina, Victoria [5 ]
Villefranque, Najda [1 ,4 ]
Rio, Catherine [1 ]
Audouin, Olivier [1 ]
Salter, James [3 ,5 ]
Bazile, Eric [1 ]
Brient, Florent [1 ]
Favot, Florence [1 ]
Honnert, Rachel [1 ]
Lefebvre, Marie-Pierre [1 ,2 ]
Madeleine, Jean-Baptiste [2 ]
Rodier, Quentin [1 ]
Xu, Wenzhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, CNRS, CNRM, Meteo France, Toulouse, France
[2] Sorbonne Univ, CNRS, LMD IPSL, Paris, France
[3] Exeter Univ, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Toulouse, CNRS, LAPLACE, Toulouse, France
[5] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
calibration; large‐ eddy simulations; physical parameterizations; process‐ oriented model tuning; single‐ column models;
D O I
10.1029/2020MS002217
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The development of parameterizations is a major task in the development of weather and climate models. Model improvement has been slow in the past decades, due to the difficulty of encompassing key physical processes into parameterizations, but also of calibrating or "tuning" the many free parameters involved in their formulation. Machine learning techniques have been recently used for speeding up the development process. While some studies propose to replace parameterizations by data-driven neural networks, we rather advocate that keeping physical parameterizations is key for the reliability of climate projections. In this paper we propose to harness machine learning to improve physical parameterizations. In particular, we use Gaussian process-based methods from uncertainty quantification to calibrate the model free parameters at a process level. To achieve this, we focus on the comparison of single-column simulations and reference large-eddy simulations over multiple boundary-layer cases. Our method returns all values of the free parameters consistent with the references and any structural uncertainties, allowing a reduced domain of acceptable values to be considered when tuning the three-dimensional (3D) global model. This tool allows to disentangle deficiencies due to poor parameter calibration from intrinsic limits rooted in the parameterization formulations. This paper describes the tool and the philosophy of tuning in single-column mode. Part 2 shows how the results from our process-based tuning can help in the 3D global model tuning.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Process-Based Climate Model Development Harnessing Machine Learning: II. Model Calibration From Single Column to Global
    Hourdin, Frederic
    Williamson, Daniel
    Rio, Catherine
    Couvreux, Fleur
    Roehrig, Romain
    Villefranque, Najda
    Musat, Ionela
    Fairhead, Laurent
    Diallo, F. Binta
    Volodina, Victoria
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [2] Process-Based Climate Model Development Harnessing Machine Learning: III. The Representation of Cumulus Geometry and Their 3D Radiative Effects
    Villefranque, Najda
    Blanco, Stephane
    Couvreux, Fleur
    Fournier, Richard
    Gautrais, Jacques
    Hogan, Robin J.
    Hourdin, Frederic
    Volodina, Victoria
    Williamson, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [3] A process-based model of nitrogen cycling in forest plantations Part I. Structure, calibration and analysis of the decomposition model
    Corbeels, M
    McMurtrie, RE
    Pepper, DA
    O'Connell, AM
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2005, 187 (04) : 426 - 448
  • [4] Comparing the effects of calibration and climate errors on a statistical crop model and a process-based crop model
    James Watson
    Andrew J. Challinor
    Thomas E. Fricker
    Christopher A. T. Ferro
    Climatic Change, 2015, 132 : 93 - 109
  • [5] Comparing the effects of calibration and climate errors on a statistical crop model and a process-based crop model
    Watson, James
    Challinor, Andrew J.
    Fricker, Thomas E.
    Ferro, Christopher A. T.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 132 (01) : 93 - 109
  • [6] Combining process-based model and machine learning to predict hydrological regimes in floodplain wetlands under climate change
    Yao, Siyang
    Chen, Cheng
    Chen, Qiuwen
    Zhang, Jianyun
    He, Mengnan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 626
  • [7] GAN River-I: A process-based low NTG meandering reservoir model dataset for machine learning studies
    Sun, Chao
    Demyanov, Vasily
    Arnold, Daniel
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2023, 46
  • [8] Multi-Location Emulation of a Process-Based Salinity Model Using Machine Learning
    Qi, Siyu
    He, Minxue
    Bai, Zhaojun
    Ding, Zhi
    Sandhu, Prabhjot
    Zhou, Yu
    Namadi, Peyman
    Tom, Bradley
    Hoang, Raymond
    Anderson, Jamie
    WATER, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [9] Comparison of machine learning and process-based SWAT model in simulating streamflow in the Upper Indus Basin
    Rahman, Khalil Ur
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Jadoon, Khan Zaib
    Shahid, Muhammad
    Kushwaha, Daniel Prakash
    Duan, Zheng
    Mohammadi, Babak
    Khedher, Khaled Mohamed
    Duong Tran Anh
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (08)
  • [10] Comparison of machine learning and process-based SWAT model in simulating streamflow in the Upper Indus Basin
    Khalil Ur Rahman
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Khan Zaib Jadoon
    Muhammad Shahid
    Daniel Prakash Kushwaha
    Zheng Duan
    Babak Mohammadi
    Khaled Mohamed Khedher
    Duong Tran Anh
    Applied Water Science, 2022, 12