COMPARISON OF SPECTRAL/FOURIER DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY INSTRUMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT OF NORMAL MACULAR THICKNESS

被引:148
|
作者
Sull, Alan C. [2 ]
Vuong, Laurel N.
Price, Lori Lyn
Srinivasan, Vivek J. [3 ,4 ]
Gorczynska, Iwona [3 ,4 ]
Fujimoto, James G. [3 ,4 ]
Schuman, Joel S. [5 ]
Duker, Jay S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, New England Eye Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[3] MIT, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] MIT, Elect Res Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Eye & Ear, Med Ctr, Ctr Eye, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
来源
RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES | 2010年 / 30卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
spectral; Fourier; optical coherence tomography; normal; macular thickness; reproducibility; artifact; segmentation; TIME-DOMAIN; RETINAL THICKNESS; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bd2c3b
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report normal macular thickness measurements and assess reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements acquired by a time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Stratus, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) and three commercially available spectral/Fourier domain OCT instruments (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; RTVue-100, Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA; 3D OCT-1000, Topcon, Inc., Paramus, NJ). Methods: Forty randomly selected eyes of 40 normal, healthy volunteers were imaged. Subjects were scanned twice during 1 visit and a subset of 25 was scanned again within 8 weeks. Retinal thickness measurements were automatically generated by OCT software and recorded after manual correction. Regression and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare agreement between instruments. Reproducibility was analyzed by using intra-class correlation coefficients, and incidence of artifacts was determined. Results: Macular thickness measurements were found to have high reproducibility across all instruments with intraclass correlation coefficients values ranging 84.8% to 94.9% for Stratus OCT, 92.6% to 97.3% for Cirrus Cube, 76.4% to 93.7% for RTVue MM5, 61.1% to 96.8% for MM6, 93.1% to 97.9% for 3D OCT-1000 radial, and 31.5% to 97.5% for 3D macular scans. Incidence of artifacts was higher in spectral/Fourier domain instruments, ranging from 28.75% to 53.16%, compared with 17.46% in Stratus OCT. No significant age or sex trends were found in the measurements. Conclusion: Commercial spectral/Fourier domain OCT instruments provide higher speed and axial resolution than the Stratus OCT, although they vary greatly in scanning protocols and are currently limited in their analysis functions. Further development of segmentation algorithms and quantitative features are needed to assist clinicians in objective use of these newer instruments to manage diseases. RETINA 30: 235-245, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 245
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Macular thickness measurements in normal eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography
    Legarreta, John E.
    Gregori, Giovanni
    Punjabi, Omar S.
    Knighton, Robert W.
    Lalwani, Geeta A.
    Puliafito, Carmen A.
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2008, 39 (04) : S43 - S49
  • [2] Comparison of Macular Thickness Measurements between Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Leung, Christopher Kai-shun
    Cheung, Carol Yim-lui
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Lee, Gary
    Lin, Dusheng
    Pang, Chi Pui
    Lam, Dennis S. C.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2008, 49 (11) : 4893 - 4897
  • [3] Comparison of Macular Thickness in Diabetic Macular Edema Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Kakinoki, Masashi
    Miyake, Taichirou
    Sawada, Osamu
    Sawada, Tomoko
    Kawamura, Hajime
    Ohji, Masahito
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [4] Macular thickness of Chinese with fourier-domain optical coherence tomography
    Yu Weihong
    Zheng Lin
    Dai Rongping
    Zhang Zhiqiao
    Dong Fangtian
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2011, 89 (01) : E104 - E105
  • [5] Reproducibility of Macular Thickness Measurements in Normal and Pathologic Eyes from two different Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments
    Nava, Lorane
    Tepelus, Tudor
    Hariri, Amir H.
    Balasubramanian, Siva
    Sadda, Srinivas R.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [6] Normal Macular Thickness in Healthy Indian Eyes Using Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Natung, Tanie
    Keditsu, Avonuo
    Lyngdoh, Laura Amanda
    Dkhar, Begonia
    Prakash, Gunjan
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 5 (03): : 176 - 179
  • [7] MACULAR THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS IN NORMAL EYES WITH TIME-DOMAIN AND FOURIER-DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
    Huang, Jingjing
    Liu, Xing
    Wu, Ziqiang
    Xiao, Hui
    Dustin, Laurie
    Sadda, Srinivas
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2009, 29 (07): : 980 - 987
  • [8] Macular thickness and macular volume measurements using spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal Nepalese eyes
    Pokharel, Amrit
    Shrestha, Gauri Shankar
    Shrestha, Jyoti Baba
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 511 - 519
  • [9] MACULAR THICKNESS BY USING SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    Heydarian, Samira
    Emamian, Mohammad Hassan
    Fotouhi, Akbar
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2022, 42 (08): : 1599 - 1607
  • [10] Macular thickness measurements using Copernicus Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
    Gella, Laxmi
    Raman, Rajiv
    Sharma, Tarun
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 29 (02) : 121 - 125