Comparing Design Thinking Traits between National Samples of Civil Engineering and Architecture Students

被引:4
|
作者
Todoroff, Emma Coleman [1 ]
Shealy, Tripp [1 ]
Milovanovic, Julie [2 ]
Godwin, Allison [3 ]
Paige, Frederick [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Grad Sch Architecture Nantes, AAU CRENAU, 6 Quai Francois Mitterrand, F-44200 Nantes, France
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Engn Educ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING EDUCATION | 2021年 / 147卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CREATIVITY;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000037
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Civil engineers and architects are both trained in design thinking, but they approach the process of design from differing perspectives largely due to the divergence in their educational curriculums. With an interest in the effect of differing educational perspectives on design thinking outcomes, comparisons were made between the self-identified design thinking abilities of students in their final year of undergraduate civil engineering or architecture programs. Perceived design thinking ability was evaluated through a survey that was distributed to students enrolled in 4-year institutions across the United States. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare responses between the civil engineering (n = 356) and architecture (n = 335) student samples. There is a significant difference in perceived design thinking ability between the groups. Architecture students score higher than civil engineering students on all design thinking traits. Based on these results, the civil engineering curriculum may benefit from the incorporation of pedagogy that emphasizes design thinking, like studio-based learning. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DESIGN THINKING APPLIED IN CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDIES
    Candel Perez, Miguel
    Calvo-Jurado, Carmen
    EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 4897 - 4901
  • [2] Teaching Systems Thinking and Biomimicry to Civil Engineering Students
    Cattano, Corey
    Nikou, Tina
    Klotz, Leidy
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL ISSUES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2011, 137 (04) : 176 - 182
  • [3] Close the rift between rational thinking and perceptual thinking-cultivation and exploration of design thinking in students majoring in architecture
    Yingchun, Cao
    Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2014, 6 (07) : 1263 - 1266
  • [4] Development of safe design thinking among engineering students
    Behm, Michael
    Culvenor, John
    Dixon, Gene
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 63 : 1 - 7
  • [5] Higher Perceived Design Thinking Traits and Active Learning in Design Courses Motivate Engineering Students to Tackle Energy Sustainability in Their Careers
    Milovanovic, Julie
    Shealy, Tripp
    Katz, Andrew
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [6] Aesthetic evaluation differences between two interrelated disciplines: A comparative study on architecture and civil engineering students
    Garip, Ervin
    Garip, Banu
    WORLD CONFERENCE ON DESIGN, ARTS AND EDUCATION (DAE-2012), 2012, 51 : 533 - 540
  • [7] Is There a Correlation between First Year Critical Thinking Assessment Test Performance and Retention among Civil Engineering Students?
    Weatherton, Yvette Pearson
    Kruzic, Andrew P.
    Mattingly, Stephen P.
    Rahman, Ziaur
    Frost, Heather L.
    2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [8] DEVELOPING THE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF STUDENTS IN CIVIL AND BUILDING ENGINEERING AT LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY
    Gibbins, Lynda
    Perkin, Glynis
    Sander, Graham
    INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 8299 - 8309
  • [9] National design competitions for biomedical engineering students
    Goldberg, JR
    IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2003, 22 (06): : 29 - 31
  • [10] Implementing a Cornerstone Design Thinking Course in First Year Civil Engineering
    Majzoub, Gustavo g.
    Zancul, Eduardo
    Lopes, Roseli De Deus
    Scheer, Sergio
    Hochgreb-Hagele, Tatiana
    Blikstein, Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2023, 39 (05) : 1074 - 1101