Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: US Vs. China

被引:334
|
作者
Venkatesh, Viswanath [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaojun [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Walton Coll Business, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Informat Syst, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
Technology Adoption; UTAUT; Cultural Differences; Social Influence;
D O I
10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856507
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This paper seeks to enrich our understanding of research on technology adoption by examining a potential boundary condition, related to culture, of the fairly recently developed model of technology adoption and use-i.e., unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Based on the cultural differences between the U.S. and China, we outline the similarities and dissimilarities between the hypotheses specified in the original UTAUT, which was validated in the U.S., and how the relationships will play in the context of employees in China. We conducted an empirical study in a single organization that operated both in the U.S. and China and collected longitudinal data from a total of over 300 employees in one business unit in each of the two countries. Our study confirmed our hypotheses that social influence will be more uniformly important across all employees, without contingencies related to gender, age and volunatariness that were found to be the case in the U.S. As we theorized, other UTAUT hypotheses held both in the U.S. and China. This work contributes by examining culture as a boundary condition and identifies the bounds of generalizability of UTAUT.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 27
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: EXTENDING THE UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY
    Venkatesh, Viswanath
    Thong, James Y. L.
    Xu, Xin
    MIS QUARTERLY, 2012, 36 (01) : 157 - 178
  • [2] Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology
    Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States
    不详
    不详
    MIS Quart Manage Inf Syst, 2012, 1 (157-178):
  • [3] Explaining intention and use of Mhealth with the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology
    van de Werken, Hermanus A.
    Rohrbach, Pieter J.
    Bolman, Catherine A. W.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2025, 254
  • [4] IT Acceptance by nurses in Morocco: Application of a modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
    Bennani, Az-Eddine
    Oumlil, Rachid
    INNOVATION VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2012, : 697 - 705
  • [5] Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model for User Acceptance Analysis of Bitcoin
    Purbandini
    Justitia, Army
    Hau, Alberto Martin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES AND STATISTICS 2020, 2021, 2329
  • [6] Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead
    Venkatesh, Viswanath
    Thong, James Y. L.
    Xu, Xin
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 17 (05): : 328 - 376
  • [7] Examining the Impact of Training in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
    Harris, Matthew E.
    Mills, Robert J.
    Fawson, Christopher
    Johnson, Jeffrey J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 58 (03) : 221 - 233
  • [8] VALIDATION OF UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY SCALES FOR FACEBOOK
    Grosova, Stanislava
    Kutnohorska, Olga
    STRATEGIC MODELING IN MANAGEMENT, ECONOMY AND SOCIETY (IDIMT-2018), 2018, 47 : 237 - 242
  • [9] Acceptance of contactless technology in the hospitality industry: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2
    Hao, Fei
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2021, 26 (12) : 1386 - 1401
  • [10] The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review
    Williams, Michael D.
    Rana, Nripendra P.
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 28 (03) : 443 - 488