Comparison of different clustering methods for investigating individual differences using choice experiments

被引:5
|
作者
Asioli, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Berget, I. [2 ]
Naes, T. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Nofima AS, As, Norway
[3] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Iced coffee; Consumers; Choice experiment; Clustering methods; Method comparison; Norway; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; ICED COFFEE; MARKET-SEGMENTATION; MIXED LOGIT; CLASS MODEL; CONSUMERS; PREFERENCES; NORWAY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.029
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Different strategies for investigating individual differences among consumers using choice experiments are compared. The paper is based on a consumer study of iced coffee in Norway. Consumers (n = 102) performed a choice task of twenty different iced coffee profiles varying in coffee type, production origin, calorie content and price following an orthogonal design. Consumer factors, such as socio-demographics, attitudes and habits, were also collected. Choice data will be analysed using two different clustering strategies. Strategy one is the most classical approach called Latent Class Logit (LCL) model, while Strategy two uses Mixed Logit (ML) model combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for visual segmentation or with automatic clustering detection using Fuzzy C Means clustering (FCM). The clusters obtained can be interpreted using external consumer factors by using the Partial Least Square - Discrimination Analysis (PLS-DA) model. The different approaches are compared in terms of data analysis methodologies, modelling, outcomes, interpretation, flexibility, practical issues and user friendliness.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 378
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of two different strategies for investigating individual differences among consumers in choice experiments. A case study based on preferences for iced coffee in Norway
    Asioli, D.
    Almli, V. L.
    Naes, T.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2016, 54 : 79 - 89
  • [2] Individual Differences Methods for Randomized Experiments
    Tucker-Drob, Elliot M.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (03) : 298 - 318
  • [3] Discrete choice survey experiments:: A comparison using flexible methods
    Siikamaki, Juha
    Layton, David F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 53 (01) : 122 - 139
  • [4] Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison
    Gelbard, Roy
    Goldman, Orit
    Spiegler, Israel
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2007, 63 (01) : 155 - 166
  • [5] Comparison of different clustering methods applied to omics datasets
    Cai, Yupei
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMLT 2022, 2022, : 105 - 111
  • [6] Comparison Of Two Different Methods For Clustering SCG Signals
    Sandler, Richard H.
    Ahdy, Sherif
    Azad, Md Khushidul
    Raval, Nirav
    Mentz, Robert
    Mansy, Hansen
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2023, 29 (04) : 597 - 597
  • [7] Investigating Emotion Style in Human Faces Using Clustering Methods
    Melgare, Julia Kubiak
    Queiroz, Rossana Baptista
    Musse, Soraia Raupp
    IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 42 (04) : 52 - 71
  • [8] Psychographic segmentation of multichannel customers: investigating the influence of individual differences on channel choice and switching behavior
    Bloemker, Jan
    Albrecht, Carmen-Maria
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2024, 79
  • [9] Investigating individual differences in emotion recognition ability using the ERAM test
    Laukka, Petri
    Banziger, Tanja
    Israelsson, Alexandra
    Cortes, Diana Sanchez
    Tornberg, Christina
    Scherer, Klaus R.
    Fischer, Hakan
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2021, 220
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF CLUSTERING COUNTRIES ON THE BASIS OF EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES
    GRIFFETH, RW
    HOM, PW
    DENISI, AS
    KIRCHNER, WK
    HUMAN RELATIONS, 1985, 38 (09) : 813 - 840