Interventions to Promote Repeat Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:42
|
作者
Vernon, Sally W. [1 ]
McQueen, Amy [2 ]
Tiro, Jasmin A. [3 ]
del Junco, Deborah J. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth Promot & Prevent Res, Div Hlth Promot & Behav Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Hlth Behav Res, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Div Behav & Commun Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Univ Texas Med Sch, Dept Surg & Pediat, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Texas Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Houston, TX USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CLIENT-DIRECTED INTERVENTIONS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TAILORED INTERVENTIONS; PATIENT REMINDERS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; HEALTH BELIEF; WOMEN; CARE; ADHERENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djq223
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Various interventions to promote repeat use of mammography have been evaluated, but the efficacy of such interventions is not well understood. We searched electronic databases through August 15, 2009, and extracted data to calculate unadjusted effect estimates (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]). Eligible studies were those that reported estimates of repeat screening for intervention and control groups. We tested homogeneity and computed summary odds ratios. To explore possible causes of heterogeneity, we performed stratified analyses, examined meta-regression models for 15 a priori explanatory variables, and conducted influence analyses. We used funnel plots and asymmetry tests to assess publication bias. Statistical tests were two-sided. The 25 eligible studies (27 effect estimates) were statistically significantly heterogeneous (Q = 69.5, I (2) = 63%, P < .001). Although there were homogeneous subgroups in some categories of the 15 explanatory variables, heterogeneity persisted after stratification. For all but one explanatory variable, subgroup summary odds ratios were similar with overlapping confidence intervals. The summary odds ratio for the eight heterogeneous reminder-only studies was the largest observed (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.41 to 2.29) and was statistically significantly greater than the summary odds ratio (P-diff = .008) for the homogeneous group of 17 studies that used the more intensive strategies of education/motivation or counseling (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.37). However, reminder-only studies remained statistically significantly heterogeneous, whereas the studies classified as education/motivation or counseling were homogeneous. Similarly, in meta-regression modeling, the only statistically significant predictor of the intervention effect size was intervention strategy (reminder-only vs the other two combined as the referent). Publication bias was not apparent. The observed heterogeneity precludes a summary effect estimate. We also cannot conclude that reminder-only intervention strategies are more effective than alternate strategies. Additional studies are needed to identify methods or strategies that could increase repeat mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1039
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography
    Leung, J.
    McKenzie, S.
    Martin, J.
    McLaughlin, D.
    RURAL AND REMOTE HEALTH, 2014, 14 (02):
  • [2] Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Synthetic Mammography, and Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Wadera, Akshay
    Al-Ghita, Mohammed Kashif
    Al-Ghetaa, Rayeh Kashef
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Pozdnyakov, Alex
    Zha, Nanxi
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Sharifabadi, Anahita Dehmoobad
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Freitas, Vivianne
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (06): : 680 - 690
  • [3] Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Junjie Liu
    Jiangjie Lei
    Yuhang Ou
    Yilong Zhao
    Xiaofeng Tuo
    Baoming Zhang
    Mingwang Shen
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023, 23 : 2341 - 2356
  • [4] Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Noble, Meredith
    Bruening, Wendy
    Uhl, Stacey
    Schoelles, Karen
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 279 (06) : 881 - 890
  • [5] Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meredith Noble
    Wendy Bruening
    Stacey Uhl
    Karen Schoelles
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 279 : 881 - 890
  • [6] Mammography diagnosis of breast cancer screening through machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Junjie
    Lei, Jiangjie
    Ou, Yuhang
    Zhao, Yilong
    Tuo, Xiaofeng
    Zhang, Baoming
    Shen, Mingwang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (06) : 2341 - 2356
  • [7] Breast cancer screening using synthesized two-dimensional mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Baoqi
    Yu, Kai
    Gao, Le
    Zeng, Xueyang
    Zhou, Qingxin
    BREAST, 2021, 59 : 270 - 278
  • [8] Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hussein, Heba
    Abbas, Engy
    Keshavarzi, Sareh
    Fazelzad, Rouhi
    Bukhanov, Karina
    Kulkarni, Supriya
    Au, Frederick
    Ghai, Sandeep
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    Freitas, Vivianne
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (03)
  • [9] Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    Strand, Fredrik
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Nishikawa, Robert M.
    Sharma, Nisha
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Moy, Linda
    Mann, Ritse M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (05)
  • [10] The effect of mammography pain on repeat participation in breast cancer screening: A systematic review
    Whelehan, Patsy
    Evans, Andy
    Wells, Mary
    MacGillivray, Steve
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (04): : 389 - 394