Comparison of outcomes at 6 weeks following postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions by doctors and nurses in India: a case-control study

被引:20
|
作者
Yadav, Vivek [1 ]
Balasubramaniam, Sudharsanam [1 ]
Das, Saswati [1 ]
Srivastava, Ashish [1 ,2 ]
Srivastava, Ashish [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Somesh [1 ]
Sood, Bulbul [1 ]
机构
[1] Jhpiego, 221,Okhla Phase 3, New Delhi 110020, India
[2] Jhpiego, 270 1st Floor, Patna 800013, Bihar, India
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
Task sharing; Postpartum family planning; Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device; Nurses; Midwives; IUD INSERTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.012
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: As part of a strategy to revitalize postpartum family planning services, Government of India revised its policy in 2013 to permit trained nurses and midwives to insert postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCDs). This study compares two key outcomes of PPIUCD insertions - expulsion and infection - for physicians and nurses/midwives to generate evidence for task sharing. Study design: We analyzed secondary data from the PPIUCD program in seven states using a case-control study design. We included facilities where both doctors and nurses/midwives performed PPIUCD insertions and where five or more cases of expulsion and/or infection were reported during the study period (January-December 2013). For each case of expulsion and infection, we identified a time-matched control who received a PPIUCD at the same facility and had no complaints. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis focusing on provider cadre while controlling for potential confounding factors. Results: In 137 facilities, 792 expulsion and 382 infection cases were matched with 1041 controls. Provider type was not significantly associated with either expulsion [odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-4.12] or infection (OR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.39-1.37). Compared with centralized training, odds of expulsion were higher for onsite (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.86-2.89) and on-the-job training (OR 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11-1.36), but odds of infection were lower for onsite (OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.75) and on-the-job training (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.25-0.37). Conclusion: Trained nurses and midwives who conduct deliveries at public health facilities can perform PPIUCD insertions as safely as physicians. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 355
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of using nurses to perform postpartum intrauterine device insertions in Kalyani Hospital, India
    Bhadra, Banasree
    Burman, Sougata K.
    Purandare, Chittaranjan N.
    Divakar, Hema
    Sequeira, Thelma
    Bhardwaj, Ajey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 : 33 - 37
  • [2] One-year continuation of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: Findings from a prospective cohort study in India
    Srivastava, Ashish
    Sharma, Surendra
    Lalchandani, Kamlesh
    Mohanty, Nochiketa
    Bhatt, Deepak Chandra
    Usmanova, Gulnoza
    Sood, Bulbul
    Kumar, Somesh
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [3] One-year continuation of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: findings from a retrospective cohort study in India
    Kumar, Somesh
    Srivastava, Ashish
    Sharma, Surendra
    Yadav, Vivek
    Mittal, Atul
    Kim, Young-Mi
    Nash-Mercado, Angela
    Reijneveld, Sijmen A.
    Sood, Bulbul
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (04) : 212 - 216
  • [4] Determinants of Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Uptake among Women Delivering in Public Hospitals of South Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019: An Unmatched Case-Control Study
    Assefaw, Mandefro
    Azanew, Getnet
    Engida, Ayenew
    Tefera, Zenebe
    Gashaw, Wondimnew
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [5] Determinants of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Discontinuation Among Women Using Family Planning, in Southwest Ethiopia: Unmatched Case-Control Study
    Wolde, Tarekegn Fekede
    Bayisa, Kenbon
    Bekele, Firomsa
    OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 13 : 39 - 47
  • [6] Intrauterine device use and the risk of pre-eclampsia: a case-control study
    Parker, S. E.
    Jick, S. S.
    Werler, M. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (05) : 788 - 795
  • [7] Comparison of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device in a Teaching Institute of Rural Bengal: A Longitudinal Cohort Study
    Burman, Sougata Kumar
    Mukherjee, Jayeeta
    Chowdhury, Ranita Roy
    Deb, Soumen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (04)
  • [8] Intrauterine device use and risk of ovarian cancer: Results from the New England Case-Control study and Nurses' Health Studies
    Yang, Jiaxi
    Sasamoto, Naoko
    Babic, Ana
    Vitonis, Allison F.
    Townsend, Mary K.
    Titus, Linda
    Cramer, Daniel W.
    Tworoger, Shelley S.
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 149 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [9] Tuberculosis among resident doctors and nurses in a tertiary care hospital: A case-control study
    Chavan, Yuvaraj B.
    Shenoy, Priyanka S.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 11 (05) : 1771 - 1775
  • [10] INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE USE AND RISK OF TUBAL PREGNANCY - AN INDONESIAN CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    BASUKI, B
    ROSSING, MA
    DALING, JR
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (05) : 1000 - 1005