共 50 条
Classifying individuals at high-risk for psychosis based on functional brain activity during working memory processing
被引:19
|作者:
Bendfeldt, Kerstin
[1
]
Smieskova, Renata
[1
,2
]
Koutsouleris, Nikolaos
[5
]
Kloeppel, Stefan
[7
]
Schmidt, Andre
[1
,2
]
Walter, Anna
[2
,3
]
Harrisberger, Fabienne
[1
,2
]
Wrege, Johannes
[2
]
Simon, Andor
Taschler, Bernd
[4
]
Nichols, Thomas
[4
]
Riecher-Roessler, Anita
[2
]
Lang, Undine E.
[2
]
Radue, Ernst-Wilhelm
[1
]
Borgwardt, Stefan
[1
,2
,6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Med Image Anal Ctr, Mittlere Str 83, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Psychiat, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Univ Hosp Psychiat, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Warwick, Dept Stat, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[6] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Dept Psychosis Studies, London SE5 8AF, England
[7] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Freiburg, Germany
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
英国惠康基金;
关键词:
Working memory;
Classification;
Machine learning;
Magnetic resonance imaging;
Schizophrenia;
Risk factors;
ULTRA-HIGH-RISK;
ABNORMAL EFFECTIVE CONNECTIVITY;
DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX;
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;
1ST-EPISODE SCHIZOPHRENIA;
MENTAL STATE;
ANTIPSYCHOTIC TREATMENT;
PATTERN-CLASSIFICATION;
AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION;
PRODROMAL PSYCHOSIS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.015
中图分类号:
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号:
100207 ;
摘要:
The psychosis high-risk state is accompanied by alterations in functional brain activity during working memory processing. We used binary automatic pattern-classification to discriminate between the at-risk mental state (ARMS), first episode psychosis (FEP) and healthy controls (HCs) based on n-back WM-induced brain activity. Linear support vector machines and leave-one-out-cross-validation were applied to fMRI data of matched ARMS, FEP and HC (19 subjects/group). The HC and ARMS were correctly classified, with an accuracy of 76.2% (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 63.2%, p = 0.01) using a verbal working memory network mask. Only 50% and 47.4% of individuals were classified correctly for HC vs. FEP (p = 0.46) or ARMS vs. FEP (p = 0.62), respectively. Without mask, accuracy was 65.8% for HC vs. ARMS (p = 0.03) and 65.8% for HC vs. FEP (p = 0.0047), and 57.9% for ARMS vs. FEP (p = 0.18). Regions in the medial frontal, paracingulate, cingulate, inferior frontal and superior frontal gyri, inferior and superior parietal lobules, and precuneus were particularly important for group separation. These results suggest that FEP and HC or FEP and ARMS cannot be accurately separated in small samples under these conditions. However, ARMS can be identified with very high sensitivity in comparison to HC. This might aid classification and help to predict transition in the ARMS. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 563
页数:9
相关论文