Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement

被引:10
|
作者
Surman, Timothy Luke [1 ]
Abrahams, John Matthew [1 ]
Kim, Jaewon [2 ]
Surman, Hayley Elizabeth [3 ]
Roberts-Thomson, Ross [4 ]
Montarello, Joseph Matthew [4 ]
Edwards, James [1 ]
Worthington, Michael [1 ]
Beltrame, John [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Adelaide Hosp, DArcy Sutherland Cardiothorac Surg Unit, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Cardiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Cardiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Quality of life; Frailty; Depression; Angina; PROMS; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; QUESTIONNAIRE; DEPRESSION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13019-022-01876-w
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Our objective was to report on the prospective outcomes in the areas of depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty in SAVR and TAVR patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve intervention. Methods We recruited 300 patients across 3 groups (TAVR, SAVR, and CABG) over 12 months. Depression, quality of life, frailty, and angina were assessed followed by propensity score matching. Results Using logistical regression when all patient factors considered for all patients who had SAVR and TAVR, the only preoperative factors that impacted on 1 year mortality was hypertension and STS score. Quality of life improvements within each group over 12 months was significant (p value = 0.0001). Depression at 12 months between groups (p value = 0.0395) and within each group was significant (p value = 0.0073 for SAVR and 0.0001 for TAVR). Angina was most frequent in TAVR at 12 months in the QL (p = 0.0001), PL (p = 0.0007), and improvement was significant in the QL (SAVR p = 0.0010, TAVR p = 0.0001) and PL (SAVR p = 0.0002), TAVR p = 0.0007) domains in both groups. Frailty at 12 months improved in both groups, but was greatest in TAVR (p value = 0.00126). Conclusions This 12 months follow up of cardiac surgical patients has revealed significant improvement in PROMs and frailty in all groups by 3 months postoperative regardless of surgical or transcatheter approach. Outcome measures of quality of life and frailty could be utilized as a measure of outcome more regularly in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery regardless of approach.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality of life and frailty outcomes following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Timothy Luke Surman
    John Matthew Abrahams
    Jaewon Kim
    Hayley Elizabeth Surman
    Ross Roberts-Thomson
    Joseph Matthew Montarello
    James Edwards
    Michael Worthington
    John Beltrame
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [2] Impact of Frailty and Prefrailty on Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Arnold, Suzanne, V
    Zhao, Yanglu
    Leon, Martin B.
    Sathananthan, Janar
    Alu, Maria
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Smith, Craig R.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Cohen, David J.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 15 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [3] Frailty Status and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Octogenarians Following Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Frantzen, Astri Tafjord
    Eide, Leslie S. P.
    Fridlund, Bengt
    Haaverstad, Rune
    Hufthammer, Karl Ove
    Kuiper, Karel K. J.
    Lauck, Sandra
    Ranhoff, Anette H.
    Rudolph, James L.
    Skaar, Elisabeth
    Norekval, Tone M.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2021, 30 (08): : 1221 - 1231
  • [4] FRAILTY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    Cheema, A.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 140 : 175 - 175
  • [5] Clinical Outcomes and Valve Hemodynamics Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Van Mieghem, Nicolas
    Popma, Jeffrey
    Sondergaard, Lars
    Oh, Jae
    Chang, Yanping
    Reardon, Michael
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (04) : S48 - S48
  • [6] Impact of Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Frailty Score
    Jones, Dylan R.
    Chew, Derek P.
    Horsfall, Matthew J.
    Sinhal, Ajay R.
    Joseph, Majo X.
    Baker, Robert A.
    Bennetts, Jayme S.
    Selvanayagam, Joseph B.
    Harris, Josephine H.
    De Pasquale, Carmine G.
    Lehman, Sam J.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2022, 31 (04): : 566 - 574
  • [7] Modified essential frailty toolset to determine outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Saji, Mike
    Higuchi, Ryosuke
    Saitoh, Masakazu
    Hagiya, Kenichi
    Izumi, Yuki
    Takamisawa, Itaru
    Iguchi, Nobuo
    Nanasato, Mamoru
    Shimizu, Jun
    Tobaru, Tetsuya
    Shimokawa, Tomoki
    Takanashi, Shuichiro
    Takayama, Morimasa
    Isobe, Mitsuaki
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (04) : 341 - 345
  • [8] Quality of Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians
    Khalili, Houman
    Bansal, Priya
    Al Taii, Haider
    Morcos, Ramez
    Kucharik, Michael
    Mathews, Adithya
    Lodhi, Hamza
    Chandrasekhar, Sanjay
    Fahmy, Andrew
    Doddapaneni, Divyesh
    Maini, Brijeshwar
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 32 (10): : 375 - 379
  • [9] Trends in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes in the Post Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Chahine, Johnny
    Fiocchi, Jacob
    John, Ranjit
    Shaffer, Andrew
    Knoper, Ryan C.
    Yannopoulos, Demetris
    Raveendran, Ganesh
    Gurevich, Sergey
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [10] Cognition, Frailty, and Functional Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Kapadia, Meera
    Shi, Sandra M.
    Afilalo, Jonathan
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Laham, Roger J.
    Guibone, Kimberly
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 133 (10): : 1219 - 1222