The coexistence of tourism and mining: a strategic framework for cross-sectoral interaction

被引:8
|
作者
Moyle, Brent D. [1 ,2 ]
Moyle, Char-lee J. [1 ]
Bec, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Griffith Inst Tourism, Gold Coast, Australia
[2] Southern Cross Univ, Sch Business & Tourism, Gold Coast, Australia
关键词
management; mining; tourism; conflict; synergies; coexistence; PATH DEPENDENCE; EVOLUTION; COEVOLUTION; INNOVATION; RESILIENCE; INDUSTRIES; COMMUNITY; AREA; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/13683500.2016.1238884
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The tourism and resources sectors are often observed to come into conflict. Yet little research has examined the complex interactions between the two sectors, specifically the strategies for building resilient rural regions. Consequently, this research explores the coexistence of the tourism and resources sectors in the Gladstone and Roma regions in Queensland, Australia. A total of 78 in-depth interviews revealed a complex network of interactions between the tourism and resource sectors, outlining deficiencies in previous theoretical premises on sectoral interaction. Key findings revealed three key synergies including resources sector investment, resources sector multipliers and induced travel, and formal and informal partnerships. Strategies to enhance the coexistence also emerged focused on reducing the negative impacts of the co-evolution process, improving industrial tourism products and developing trust, partnerships and a joint vision between the two sectors. A theoretically informed management framework for future interaction is subsequently proposed for testing and application in other contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1966 / 1987
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trajectory Mining and Routing: A Cross-Sectoral Approach
    Kaklis, Dimitrios
    Kontopoulos, Ioannis
    Varlamis, Iraklis
    Emiris, Ioannis Z.
    Varelas, Takis
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [2] Strategic planning of cross-sectoral resource megaprojects: Methodology and instruments
    Plyaskina N.I.
    Kharitonova V.N.
    Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2013, 24 (2) : 108 - 116
  • [3] Development of a cross-sectoral antimicrobial resistance capability assessment framework
    Ferdinand, Angeline S.
    McEwan, Callum
    Lin, Chantel
    Betham, Kassandra
    Kandan, Karishma
    Tamolsaian, Gilam
    Pugeva, Barry
    McKenzie, Joanna
    Browning, Glenn
    Gilkerson, James
    Coppo, Mauricio
    James, Rodney
    Peel, Trisha
    Levy, Steph
    Townell, Nicola
    Jenney, Adam
    Stewardson, Andrew
    Cameron, Donna
    Macintyre, Alison
    Buising, Kirsty
    Howden, Benjamin P.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2024, 9 (01):
  • [4] Those who want cross-sectoral Care must pay for cross-sectoral support!
    Schroeder, Axel
    UROLOGE, 2018, 57 (08): : 1007 - 1008
  • [5] STATE INDUSTRIAL POLICY AS FORMATION OF INTERNATIONAL CROSS-SECTORAL INTERACTION
    Gollyak, Y. B.
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2010, (114): : 45 - 54
  • [6] Mining in Ghana's forests: cross-sectoral linkages and the prospects for REDD
    Hirons, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2013, 35 (03) : 283 - 302
  • [7] Cross-sectoral Circular Care
    Hogsgaard, Ditte
    Wentzer, Helle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [8] Cross-sectoral Pain Management
    Berwanger, C.
    SCHMERZ, 2013, 27 (04): : 417 - 417
  • [9] Spatial and cross-sectoral input spillover effects: the case of the Italian tourism industry
    Emili, Silvia
    Galli, Federica
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2023, 59 (03) : 243 - 258
  • [10] Spatial and cross-sectoral input spillover effects: the case of the Italian tourism industry
    Silvia Emili
    Federica Galli
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2023, 59 : 243 - 258