Three Faces of Climate Justice

被引:24
|
作者
Dolsak, Nives [1 ]
Prakash, Aseem [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Marine & Environm Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Polit Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Ctr Environm Polit, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
climate justice; climate equity; mitigation; adaptation; just transition; ELECTRIC VEHICLE INCENTIVES; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; COLLECTIVE ACTION; EQUITY IMPACTS; EARLY ADOPTERS; ADAPTATION; POLITICS; POLICY; DISPARITIES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125514
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
There is overwhelming consensus about the science of climate change. Climate politics, however, remains volatile, driven by perceptions of injustice, which motivate policy resistance and undermine policy legitimacy. We identify three types of injustice. The first pertains to the uneven exposure to climate change impacts across countries and communities within a country. Socially, politically, and economically disadvantaged communities that have contributed the least to the climate crisis tend to be affected the most. To address climate change and its impacts, countries and subnational units have enacted a range of policies. But even carefully designed mitigation and adaptation policies distribute costs (the second justice dimension) and benefits (the third justice dimension) unevenly across sectors and communities, often reproducing existing inequalities. Climate justice requires paying careful attention to who bears the costs and who gets the benefits of both climate inaction and action.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 301
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条