Experimental study on retaining wall with EPS cushion under different backfill widths

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng Jun-jie [1 ]
Shao An-di [1 ]
Xie Ming-xing [2 ]
Jing Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil & Hydraul Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
earth pressure; retaining wall; EPS cushion; model test; limited backfill width; ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURES;
D O I
10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0863
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Setting a flexible cushion behind the rigid retaining wall can increase the actual lateral displacement of the backfill and effectively reduce the earth pressure acting on the wall. A self-made model box was used to conduct laboratory tests to simulate the working conditions of the retaining wall with EPS cushion behind the wall in the static state and the translation mode, and to explore the distribution of the static earth pressure and active earth pressure of the retaining wall under different backfill widths, and to study the influence of EPS cushion parameters on its decompression performance. By defining the decompression efficiency of the EPS cushion, the decompression performance of the EPS cushion behind the retaining wall was quantitatively analyzed. The results show that under limited backfill conditions, there is a gap between the maximum decompression efficiency of the EPS cushion and the equivalent decompression efficiency of the active earth pressure. However, under this circumstance, parameters of the EPS cushion have little effect on the decompression efficiency. As the backfill width gradually increases to the semi-infinite soil range, the maximum decompression efficiency of the EPS cushion gradually increases and then keeps stable at the equivalent decompression efficiency of active earth pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 332
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] AMPERA B, 2005, ELECTRON J GEOTECH E, V10, DOI [10.1093/pcp/pct051, DOI 10.1093/PCP/PCT051]
  • [2] Earthquake Load Attenuation Using EPS Geofoam Buffers in Rigid Wall Applications
    Bathurst R.J.
    Zarnani S.
    [J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 43 (4) : 283 - 291
  • [3] Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffers
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    Zarnani, Saman
    Gaskin, Andrew
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (04) : 324 - 332
  • [4] Numerical study of passive and active earth pressures of sands
    Benmeddour, D.
    Mellas, M.
    Frank, R.
    Mabrouki, A.
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2012, 40 : 34 - 44
  • [5] Chen JX, 2019, ROCK SOIL MECH, V40, P2284, DOI 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0768
  • [6] CHEN Jing-wen, 2007, CHINESE J GEOTECHNIC, V29, P152
  • [7] CHEN Ye-kai, 2001, MODEL TEST NUMERICAL
  • [8] DAI Xia-bin, 2016, EXPT STUDY ACTIVE EA
  • [9] Lateral earth pressures on flexible cantilever retaining walls with deformable geofoam inclusions
    Ertugrul, Ozgur L.
    Trandafir, Aurelian C.
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2013, 158 : 23 - 33
  • [10] Reduction of Lateral Earth Forces Acting on Rigid Nonyielding Retaining Walls by EPS Geofoam Inclusions
    Ertugrul, Ozgur L.
    Trandafir, Aurelian C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 23 (12) : 1711 - 1718