Sand bank Koketrays - a Case Study on the Effect of Marine Protected Area Designation as a Key Approach to Black Sea Biodiversity and Habitats Conservation

被引:0
|
作者
Konsulova, Tsenka H. [1 ]
Trayanova, Antoaneta T. [1 ]
Todorova, Valentina R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bulgarian Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, Varna 9000, Bulgaria
来源
ACTA ZOOLOGICA BULGARICA | 2010年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
ecosystem approach; ecological state; zoobenthic coenosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Sand bank Koketrays is the second marine area declared 'protected' along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast in 2001. A comparative analysis between zoobenthic coenoses in Bourgas Bay and sand bank Koketrays, as the main prerequisite for the conservation of the sand bank as a protected area is discussed in the paper. Three periods in the evolution of macrozoobenthic community are outlined: the period when no local anthropogenic impact was registered (1990-1992), just after the performance of bottom trawling for Rapana venosa in 1999 (2000-2002) and a three years period later (2003-2006). An increasing of the opportunistic Polychaeta and Oligochaeta species in abundance is established between 2000-2002 (a total of 44% vs. 69%) and nearly 5 times decrease in abundance of the conservative mollusk species (42% vs. 9%). A positive tendency toward recovery of the ecological state of bottom invertebrate fauna after the announcement of the site as 'protected area' is established the participation of sensitive species (I EG) increases up to 27.7 % and the AMBI index reaches 2.18, which indicates a process of gradually improvement of zoobenthic coenosis ecological status.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 97
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Role of a large marine protected area for conserving landscape attributes of sand habitats on Georges Bank (NW Atlantic)
    Lindholm, J
    Auster, P
    Valentine, P
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2004, 269 : 61 - 68
  • [2] Conservation targets in marine protected area management suffer from shifting baseline syndrome: A case study on the Dogger Bank
    Plumeridge, Annabel A.
    Roberts, Callum M.
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2017, 116 (1-2) : 395 - 404
  • [3] Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation: A case-study of Meghalaya state
    Khan, ML
    Menon, S
    Bawa, KS
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1997, 6 (06) : 853 - 868
  • [4] Effectiveness of the protected area network in biodiversity conservation: a case-study of Meghalaya state
    M. Latif Khan
    Shaily Menon
    Kamaljit S. Bawa
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 1997, 6 : 853 - 868
  • [5] Distance-decay effect on willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation: The case of a megadiverse protected area
    Enrique Orihuela, Carlos
    Alberto Minaya, Carlos
    Mercado, Waldemar
    Alberto Jimenez, Luis
    Estrada, Milagros
    Jazmine Gomez, Harriet
    ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2020, 20 (01): : 169 - 190
  • [6] Mapping biodiversity conservation priorities for protected areas: A case study in Xishuangbanna Tropical Area, China
    Huang, Zhongde
    Bai, Yang
    Alatalo, Juha M.
    Yang, Zhangqian
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 249
  • [7] Governance in the early stages of marine protected area development: A case study of Nusa Penida District Marine Conservation Area, Indonesia
    Yunitawati, Dinah
    Clifton, Julian
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 127
  • [8] Measuring conservation success with missing Marine Protected Area boundaries: A case study in the Coral Triangle
    Venegas-Li, Ruben
    Cros, Annick
    White, Alan
    Mora, Camilo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 : 119 - 124
  • [9] Improving marine protected area with coordination platform: Mud shrimp conservation in Taiwan case study
    Hung, Yi-Ping
    Chang, Yi
    Truong, Minh-Phuong N.
    Yang, Jen-Han
    Hsu, Tung-Yao
    Hsiao, Shih-Chun
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 131
  • [10] Local Expectations for Future Marine Protected Area Performance: A Case Study of the Proposed National Marine Conservation Area in the Southern Strait of Georgia, Canada
    Dearden, Philip
    Heck, Nadine
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 40 (06) : 577 - 593